Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222055: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2003 12:28:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 25 06:28:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AOW4C-0003nF-00; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:48:52 -0600
Received: from newsamosa.debian.org [208.185.25.35] (mail)
by merkel.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AO5ev-0007Uc-00; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 18:37:01 -0700
Received: from node-4024482a.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net (Angel.zoy.org) [64.36.72.42]
(foobar)
by newsamosa.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AO5eZ-0002BN-00; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:36:39 -0500
Received: by Angel.zoy.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D2ADDB872; Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
The following trivial program gives a compile warning using gcc-2.95 or
gcc272 on my debian testing system. gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3 are both fine.
#include <signal.h>
int main (void)
{
return 0;
}
The warning I get is:
In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4,
from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28,
from /usr/include/signal.h:326,
from foobar.c:1:
/usr/include/linux/compiler.h:17: warning: `__attribute_used__' redefined
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:195: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
I'm not sure if I should blame libc6-dev or linux-kernel-headers for this one.
Some additional system information not collected by reportbug:
gcc272 version 2.7.2.3-18
gcc-2.95 version 1:2.95.4-19
Hope this helps,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Angel 2.4.22 #1 Fri Aug 29 00:52:26 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for developme
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 222055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:06:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 16 18:06:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldeg-0005JI-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:06:22 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F1713DEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:06:21 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michel Lespinasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#222055: libc6-dev: New headers break gcc-2.95 and gcc272
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Sun, 23 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0800,
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> The following trivial program gives a compile warning using gcc-2.95 or
> gcc272 on my debian testing system. gcc-3.2 and gcc-3.3 are both fine.
>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> int main (void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> The warning I get is:
>
> In file included from /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h:4,
> from /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28,
> from /usr/include/signal.h:326,
> from foobar.c:1:
> /usr/include/linux/compiler.h:17: warning: `__attribute_used__' redefined
> /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:195: warning: this is the location of the previous
> definition
>
> I'm not sure if I should blame libc6-dev or linux-kernel-headers for this one.
I tested with the latest sid environment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/222055> gcc-2.95 -Wall test.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/glibc/bugs/222055> gcc272 -Wall test.c
No problem.
> gcc272 version 2.7.2.3-18
> gcc-2.95 version 1:2.95.4-19
> ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> an
> ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-9 Linux Kernel Headers for
> developme
I tested with:
ii gcc272 2.7.2.3-18 The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-2.95 2.95.4-22 The GNU C compiler
ii linux-kernel-h 2.5.999-test7- Linux Kernel Headers for development
ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
I close this bug. If you still have problem, please let me know and
reopen this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
