Your message dated Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ia64 has problems with _syscall2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 05:43:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 00:43:06 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com [::ffff:156.153.255.202]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15LICm-00028e-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:43:04 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468CAAB6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
id 56E731872C; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:42:57 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build failure on ia64 (at least)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:42:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.11g-4
Priority: serious
Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody. As the
Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.
The following build failure occured on ia64 (using gcc 2.96):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
cryptic buildd database entries.
If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
other platforms. With gcc 3.0, of course.
If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
see the current autotools-dev package.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux ia 2.4.5rgh1 #1 Sun Jun 24 20:39:18 MDT 2001 ia64 unknown
base/util-linux_2.11g-4 by bdale-ia64 [required:out-of-date]
Reasons for failing:
[Category: none]
ia64 doesn't support pivot_root, bug filed
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 104227-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2004 11:07:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 05 04:07:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BhRJZ-0005PF-00; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 04:07:14 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 29793DEB58; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:07:13 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ia64 has problems with _syscall2
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> It appears that ia64 does not support pivot_root, which makes the build fail
> with
>
> install: cannot stat `mount/pivot_root': No such file or directory
>
> Marking it RC since this is a can't build from source and we intend to release
> ia64 with woody.
Nowadays we have woody. These bugs are too old. I believe they were
already fixed, so I close these bugs.
If you have objection, please reopen and explain what the problem is.
Note that asm/unistd.h is derived from kernel headers.
Regards,
-- gotom
