Your message dated Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group
list with libc6 2.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2003 09:30:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 04:30:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from iwmutel.isd.dp.ua (fluffy.isd.dp.ua) [193.108.163.194]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19mVUJ-00072m-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:30:43 -0500
Received: from mwg by fluffy.isd.dp.ua with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19mVU7-0007xW-00; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:30:31 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-U"
From: Wladimir Mutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list with libc6 2.3.2-2
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:30:31 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Rolling back to libc6 2.3.1-17 helps.
I look into /proc/N/status for smbd process, and with libc6 2.3.2-2 I see that
last group in the "Groups:" list is the same as pre-last. With libc6 2.3.1-17
this effect disappears. Like this :
Groups: 1 255 230 229 211 (with libc6 2.3.1-17)
Groups: 1 255 230 229 229 (with libc6 2.3.2-2)
Using "su" to switch to that user id does not show the same behaviour. i
May be there is something buggy in Samba as well.
We are also using NIS domain in "compat" nsswitch mode, and nscd for caching.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fluffy.isd.dp.ua 2.6.0-test2-mm4 #1 Tue Aug 5 10:11:27 EEST 2003
i686
Locale: LANG=uk_UA, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 205058-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 00:27:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 17:27:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfpQl-00056A-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:27:59 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5E5C9DEB58; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:27:52 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wladimir Mutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#205058: samba 3.0.0beta2-1 sets bad supplementary group list
with libc6 2.3.2-2
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:09:20 +0300,
Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 04:43:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:57:34 +0300,
> > Wladimir Mutel wrote:
> > > Perhaps we should wait for more fresh Samba 3.0.0 packed into .deb
> > > Samba 3.0.0 rc1 was released recently, and its changelog, in part,
> > > reads :
> > >
> > > 3) Check for broken getgrouplist() in glibc.
> > >
> > > So just please let me wait for .deb of this Samba so I could check.
> >
> > Wladimir, could you check that this bug still appears in the latest
> > samba + glibc?
>
> Our people do not notice it anymore.
That's good. I close this bug, but if you find the problem with the
latest glibc, please reopen and send us the report.
Regards,
-- gotom
