perf-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • [perf-discuss] Re: Weird CPU overload spikes on solaris 8 Ritesh
• [perf-discuss] Micro-optimization of ip_addr_match() - is slower on amd64, faster on SPARC Dan McDonald
• [perf-discuss] Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Nicolas Linkert
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Stefan Parvu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Alan Coopersmith
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: John Martin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Jürgen Keil
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Jürgen Keil
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Shawn Walker
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Alexander . Gorshenev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Jürgen Keil
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Shawn Walker
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Debian 4.0 performance vs. Nevada Build 65 performace: Jürgen Keil
• [perf-discuss] Project sponsorship request: Tesla Eric Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project sponsorship request: Tesla johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project sponsorship request: Tesla Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project sponsorship request: Tesla Jonathan Chew
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project sponsorship request: Tesla Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] filebench dormant on sourceforge? Timothy Butler
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench dormant on sourceforge? Spencer Shepler
  • RE: [perf-discuss] filebench dormant on sourceforge? Harder, David
  • RE: [perf-discuss] filebench dormant on sourceforge? Harder, David
  • [perf-discuss] Re: filebench dormant on sourceforge? eric kustarz
  • RE: [perf-discuss] filebench dormant on sourceforge? David Harder
• [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... Roland Mainz
  • Re: [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... Roland Mainz
  • Re: [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... Eric Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] RFE: "bt" (=batch) scheduler class... Roland Mainz
• [perf-discuss] Emulating oracle redo logs Niclas Sodergard
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Emulating oracle redo logs Niclas Sodergard
• [perf-discuss] project vs pool vs use Martin Presslaber
  • Re: [perf-discuss] project vs pool vs use adrian cockcroft
• [perf-discuss] Weird load spikes Jeffrey Collyer
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Weird load spikes Eric Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Weird load spikes johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Weird load spikes Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
• [perf-discuss] A good indicator of I/O problem Amir Hameed
  • Re: [perf-discuss] A good indicator of I/O problem Louwtjie Burger
  • [perf-discuss] Re: A good indicator of I/O problem Amir Hameed
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: A good indicator of I/O problem Dale Ghent
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: A good indicator of I/O problem adrian cockcroft
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: A good indicator of I/O problem johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: A good indicator of I/O problem Louwtjie Burger
• [perf-discuss] Relationship between load average and CPU saturation Ryan Chang
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Relationship between load average and CPU saturation adrian cockcroft
• [perf-discuss] Terrible performance [x86] Eddy Dean
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] David Valin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] Eddy Dean
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] David Valin
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] Eddy Dean
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] David Valin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] Wee Yeh Tan
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Terrible performance [x86] Eddy Dean
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Terrible performance [x86] Wee Yeh Tan
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Terrible performance [x86] Stefan Parvu
• [perf-discuss] test, please ignore Sean McGrath - Sun Microsystems Ireland
• [perf-discuss] Benchmark which models ISP workloads Yusuf Goolamabbas
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Benchmark which models ISP workloads Sean McGrath - Sun Microsystems Ireland
• [perf-discuss] NUMA scheduling real time threads Rafael Vanoni
  • Re: [perf-discuss] NUMA scheduling real time threads Eric Saxe
• [perf-discuss] v40-biprocessor vs T2000 T1-4cores Gabriele Bulfon
• [perf-discuss] Rule of Thumb Guidelines for Oracle Server Sizing Steven Sim
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Rule of Thumb Guidelines for Oracle Server Sizing Matty
• [perf-discuss] The likely future of x86 and Sparc processors, and whether Solaris is ready. Brian Gupta
  • Re: [perf-discuss] The likely future of x86 and Sparc processors, and whether Solaris is ready. adrian cockcroft
  • Re: [perf-discuss] The likely future of x86 and Sparc processors, and whether Solaris is ready. Bart Smaalders
• [perf-discuss] measuring interrupt latency in OpenSolaris from a simulator Thomas De Schampheleire
  • Re: [perf-discuss] measuring interrupt latency in OpenSolaris from a simulator Bart Smaalders
• [perf-discuss] Impressed with express edition but.. Joseph villa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Impressed with express edition but.. johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Impressed with express edition but.. James Cornell
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Impressed with express edition but.. Brandorr
• [perf-discuss] SAS JBOD and RAID controller (external ports) - any suggestions? Igor
• [perf-discuss] PDU error in solaris Satyanarayan Pati
  • Re: [perf-discuss] PDU error in solaris Fintan Ryan
• [perf-discuss] Add BUGS file with known bugs and a TODO list dp
• [perf-discuss] multiview emits extra </tr>'s when comparing more than two results dp
• [perf-discuss] Remove SCCS keywords: not useful in mercurial dp
• [perf-discuss] Tarball generation was a little screwed up by recent changes dp
• [perf-discuss] libmicro could compile and run on Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 dp
• [perf-discuss] Improve multiview output styling. dp
• [perf-discuss] libMicro project and repository now open Dan Price
  • Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro project and repository now open adrian cockcroft
  • Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro project and repository now open Dan Price
  • Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro project and repository now open adrian cockcroft
  • Re: [perf-discuss] libMicro project and repository now open Dan Price
• [perf-discuss] New version of NUMA observability tools Alexander Kolbasov
• RE: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss Borse, Ganesh
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss m...@bruningsystems.com
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss Borse, Ganesh
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss m...@bruningsystems.com
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss Borse, Ganesh
• [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss Borse, Ganesh
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss m...@bruningsystems.com
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at different addre ss johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Request for guidance on shmat() call attaching at Richard L. Hamilton
• [perf-discuss] [osol-discuss] Proposal: new project for improving ON build times Alexander Kolbasov
• [perf-discuss] fssnap question Brett Monroe
• [perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project Eric Saxe
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Project endorsement request: Enhance Solaris for Intel Project johansen-osdev
• [perf-discuss] filebench: stats not working? Gerard Henry
  • [perf-discuss] Re: filebench: stats not working? Richard J. McDougall
  • [perf-discuss] Re: filebench: stats not working? Gerard Henry
• [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Gerard Henry
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Alexander . Gorshenev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Gérard Henry
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Gérard Henry
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Gérard Henry
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Neelakanth Nadgir
  • Re: [perf-discuss] filebench on soalris 9 not working: libm.so.2: open failed Gérard Henry
• [perf-discuss] ufs performance allen mathias
  • Re: [perf-discuss] ufs performance Alexander . Gorshenev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance allen mathias
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Dan Price
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Alexander . Gorshenev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Dan Price
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Bart Smaalders
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Steve Clamage
  • Re: [perf-discuss] ufs performance Dan Price
  • [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance allen mathias
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Alexander . Gorshenev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance allen mathias
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance Alexander . Gorshenev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: ufs performance przemolicc
• [perf-discuss] Problem in Reading pacct file Arun
• [perf-discuss] Re: kaio problem, whether solaris kaio support socket? AD
  • [perf-discuss] Re: kaio problem, whether solaris kaio support socket? AD
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: kaio problem, whether solaris kaio support socket? Michael Schulte
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: kaio problem, whether solaris kaio support socket? AD
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: kaio problem, whether solaris kaio support socket? prakash sangappa
• [perf-discuss] Slow Access to BMC/ILOM from ipmitool Clayton Kern
• [perf-discuss] prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • RE: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • [perf-discuss] Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? adrian cockcroft
  • [perf-discuss] Re: prstat-m - cpu% does not add to 100% ? Eugene Margulis
• [perf-discuss] Filebench on Aix ? Rene
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Filebench on Aix ? Dominic Kay
• [perf-discuss] realloc() performance compared to Linux Robert Milkowski
  • Re: [perf-discuss] realloc() performance compared to Linux Phil Harman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] realloc() performance compared to Linux Roland Mainz
• [perf-discuss] bzip2 performance on SPARC / was: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: 3K man pages available Roland Mainz
• [perf-discuss] DMA mapping incredibly slow Paul Durrant
  • Re: [perf-discuss] DMA mapping incredibly slow Andrew Gallatin
  • Re: [perf-discuss] DMA mapping incredibly slow Bart Smaalders
• [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different Shreyas
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different Andrew Gallatin
• [perf-discuss] prstat, combination of regular output and microstate output Sean Liu
• [perf-discuss] How to use acctcom? Arun
  • Re: [perf-discuss] How to use acctcom? David Blasingame
• [perf-discuss] kstat / intrstat Sean Liu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] kstat / intrstat johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: kstat / intrstat Sean Liu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: kstat / intrstat johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: kstat / intrstat Sean Liu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Re: kstat / intrstat johansen-osdev
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Re: kstat / intrstat Sean Liu
• [perf-discuss] Problem with SIGEV_THREAD and POSIX message queues Michael Schulte
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Problem with SIGEV_THREAD and POSIX message queues prakash sangappa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Problem with SIGEV_THREAD and POSIX message queues prakash sangappa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Problem with SIGEV_THREAD and POSIX message queues Prakash Sangappa
• [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different NIC? Shreyas
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different NIC? Eric Saxe
  • [perf-discuss] Re: Re: Can Soalris assign different CPU to handle traffic for different Shreyas
• [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Konstantin K
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. johansen-osdev
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
  • Re: [perf-discuss] Read lock contention, solaris 9, 32 cores host. Prakash Sangappa
• [perf-discuss] lgrp kstats Henrik Loef
  • Re: [perf-discuss] lgrp kstats Jonathan . Chew
• [perf-discuss] (no subject) Steve Peng
  • [perf-discuss] (no subject) Alexander Kolbasov
  • [perf-discuss] (no subject) dongfeng
  • [perf-discuss] (no subject) dongfeng
  • [perf-discuss] (no subject) Daniel Heneghan
  • [perf-discuss] (no subject) Henrik Johansson
• [perf-discuss] non-zero service time w/o any I/O ? Leon Koll
• [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Jim Mauro
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret adrian cockcroft
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman
  • [perf-discuss] Re: prstat LAT - how to interpret Stefan Parvu
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Bob Sneed, SMI PAE
  • Re: [perf-discuss] prstat LAT - how to interpret Glen Gunselman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages