> Be careful with %w... it's not that accurate. If you upgrade your  
> e20k to Solaris 10, you'll lose that as iowait is no longer  
> calculated (although the %w column is still there for output  
> compatibility reasons. %b (% busy) is what you should be looking at  
> instead.

That's not entirely correct.  %w is, according to iostat(1), "percent of
time there are transactions waiting for service (queue non-empty)."

In Solaris 10, we deleted the calculation of the percentage of CPU time
spent waiting for I/O.  %w should be unaffected.

-j

_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to