It strikes me as odd that the installer needs 768MB, even though Glassfish 
might need 256MB of ram in addition to Netbeans, OpenSolaris, and X11/JDS, but 
this is the installer we're talking about, and with fast disks, swapping 
although slower than ram shouldn't be that big of a hit on systems with 512MB 
of ram.  The installer is still the same one in Solaris 10, and although I know 
Solaris is a work in progress and it's due to change to Anaconda or something 
of the like, the installer does not need 768MB ram to run.  Even RHEL5's 
installer can run on 256MB of ram, so it's really not something to argue about. 
 One may run svcadm and disable services at initial boot to reduce usage, but 
then again OpenSolaris finally cuts the services down to a bare minimal plus 
X11. RPC, X11, and console services are all that run on a stock install of 
Solaris Developer Edition 04/2007.  (NV62 I believe is the build)

I agree on the polish comment, I am becoming quite fond of Sun's GNOME theme, 
it's truely better than the stock GNOME themes, but then again I like the 
lickable OS X window buttons, which it reminds me of.

Might it be noted that non-x86 ports of OpenSolaris are due to push this usage, 
for it's not uncommon to find PowerPC systems maxed out at 512MB.  (800MHz 
iBook)  Some still usable SPARC systems could run OpenSolaris if one cut down 
services and rebuild a few components, but then again, these wouldn't be using 
a GUI.  Solaris Developer Edition does not have an option for console install 
nor does it have an option for package selections, this needs to be noted and 
addressed by the installer team and Sun's build engineers.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
perf-discuss mailing list
perf-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to