On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:17:27 -0700 Daniel Smith <javajo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A passive means of ranking a cache would be: > > 1) did the user already have an LM here? > 2) did an object just give a user an LM to this place? > 3) did the user just proactively create an LM? > > These are 3 distinct cases. #1 and #3 imply that the user has an > interest in coming back, and is likely to want an ongoing cache. #2 > implies that a store / venue etc may have given the user an LM they > didn't want. Ram is a lot faster than cache-on-disk, caching on disk may cause more lag while you force a re-check everytime you see it, and each file should be CRCsummed and matched with one on asset (sims aren't static, textures from avatar too). There aren't tools to assure to an agent him cached texture is still one cached the teleport before... I think ins't so easy.... > Another case is: if a user deletes an LM, it implies they may want > to free up the cache for that location as well. don't understand, cache should store all textures for a whole sims just why i've bookmarkd a LM? O_o _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
