* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, April 06, 2006 at 11:03:49 -0700:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> What about -H|--keep-hf ? Supposing I just want highest quality?
> 
>       I think it would be a good idea to define "highest quality" ;)

Oops, sorry for being so vague.

>       The
>       same type of request/desire comes up a lot on a couple forums I lurk
>       in.  It's often in the form of a statment that implies the existence
>       of a magic option or tool that will give a perfect (restored/enhanced
>       to be what the user *wants*)

Yeah, the mimimum I expect from mpeg2enc is to guess what I
actually want ;-)

Ok, let me try to be more specific. The case I had in mind was to
how to put DV footage (shot and edited by yours truly) on DVD.
Meaning that

a) I have (at least for the projects I have in mind) not space
constraints because the DVs are not long enough to cause worries
in that direction.

b) AFAICS the only constraint I have is the bitrate as I have to
compress to MJPEG-2.

So I don't mind waisting bits even for "unseen quality" (to quote
your other mail), I just want to lose as little quality as
possible when I compress.

>       -H can actually lower the quality.  Remember - there is a hard limit 
>       on the bitrate you can use and -H increases (often dramatically) the 
>       number of bits used to encode an image.    IF the number of bits/sec 
>       available is not sufficient then the encoder has NO choice but to 
>       lower the quality (by increasing the amount of lossy compression 
>       performed).    Using -H has, the times I've used it, raised the 
>       average bitrate about 30%.  IF you're already at the maximum for
>       a project (2hr movie on a DVD is limited to ~4.7Mb/s) then increasing
>       the number of bits required will cause the quality to be dropped (by
>       higher lossy compression) to make those bits available.
> 
>       If you're using double layer media and have sufficient space then -H
>       might be usable but many projects are bitrate/size constrained and
>       are already at those limits - no leeway or headroom left.

As my source has much higher quality, if I understand you
correctly, it would not make sense to apply the -H option because
of the bitrate constraint for DVD.

Please correct me if I am wrong. Hope I have been a few bits
clearer. And thanks for taking your time for a "lossless"
explanation.

c
-- 
_B A U S T E L L E N_ lesen!  --->> <http://www.blacktrash.org/baustellen.html>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to