On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Christian Ebert wrote:

> Ok, let me try to be more specific. The case I had in mind was to
> how to put DV footage (shot and edited by yours truly) on DVD.

        Ok - so it's not going thru an analog conversion and does not have
        analog noise to worry about.

        But when some people say 'quality' they have a mental image of
        their home videos looking like a "Hollywood movie mastered from 
        restored master film"...

> b) AFAICS the only constraint I have is the bitrate as I have to
> compress to MJPEG-2.

        Correct - and that is a firm limit.

> So I don't mind waisting bits even for "unseen quality" (to quote

        You should mind wasting bits.  Remember, (b) above, that you only
        have a fixed and limited number of bits/sec available.  Bits spent
        on unseen/invisible detail are wasted and NOT available for detail/
        "quality" that you CAN see.

> your other mail), I just want to lose as little quality as
> possible when I compress.

        Ok.  Question:  how will wasting bits on things you can NOT see improve
        the quality that you CAN see? ;)

> As my source has much higher quality, if I understand you
> correctly, it would not make sense to apply the -H option because
> of the bitrate constraint for DVD.

        Correct.  If you are bit rate constrained (at the limit imposed by
        either the DVD max _or_ the length of video that must fit on a disc) 
        then using -H is not a good idea.   Requesting "high resolution"
        means using more bits, but if those bits are not available then the
        quality must be lowered.

        Happy Encoding!

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to