On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, curious wrote: > The problem here is no one wrote anything for it.. and it wasn't > everything it claimed to be... and (for me atleast) confusing to navigate > around... it could run most windows apps, and anything with a gui is confusing for me..interface is a personal issue > I don't belive I implied that well, you're the one who tried to defend MS by pointing out that IBM did similar stuff > When IBM made a PC that quickly became a standard.. wouln't release the > specs of it's bios so that noone could compete with them? how is this self > defense? it's not...I never said it was...I said that MS was not defending itself against IBM Vinnie ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Vinnie Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Deirdre Saoirse
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Vinnie Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Vinnie Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Cat
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Vinnie Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Vinnie Surmonde
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Cat
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Di Gregory
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Di Gregory
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Di Gregory
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling curious
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Di Gregory
- Re: [issues] MS/DOJ ruling Deirdre Saoirse