Craig, Of course science is supposed to make assumptions. It's done all the time and rightfully so.
But those assumptions are then supposed to be tested to see if they are reasonable. This is done in two ways. One by testing against empirical evidence. Two by seeing if they are logically consistent with the generally established theories of science. This is just basic scientific method, or one essential aspect of it.... Edgar On Saturday, February 8, 2014 11:10:03 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 8, 2014 8:55:43 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: >> >> On 8 February 2014 05:03, Craig Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If there were identical triplets, and one of them grew up on the other >> side >> > of the world and spoke a different language, while the others grew up >> in the >> > same state and spoke the same language, do you think that a >> neuroscientist >> > could figure out with certainty which triplet spoke the other language >> (not >> > by looking at trace compounds that would identify a geographic region, >> etc, >> > but strictly by the vast number of different words and phrases that >> they >> > use)? >> >> It's an assumption in science that the language difference is due to >> brain difference. That's not to say that our techniques are at present >> refined enough to see a difference, but there must be one if language >> is due to the brain. >> > > I don't think science is supposed to make assumptions. > > Craig > > >> >> >> -- >> Stathis Papaioannou >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
