The only way you can lock the charging handle in, for example, a Leaf is to
be so lucky to find one with a handle that has a little lock hole, and
carrying your own tiny padlock to use that hole in the latch to lock it
down.
Cor.

On Sat, Dec 7, 2024, 5:00 AM Rush via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:

> The J1772 SAE Specifications state in Section 4: General Conductive
> Charging
> 4.7.5 Latching
> The coupler shall have a latching mechanism to prevent inadvertent or
> accidental decoupling. The latching mechanism should provide a means in the
> connector to open the proximity detection conductor (see 4.2.2) when
> disengaging from the vehicle inlet.
> 4.7.6 Locking Function
> The coupler locking function is intended to reduce the likelihood of
> tampering with, or an unauthorized removal, of the vehicle connector from
> the vehicle inlet.
>
> And while "stealing the EVSE is not the problem of this project ;-)", it
> can certainly be a result. That's all I'm saying.
>
> Happy Holidays
>
> Rush Dougherty
> TucsonEV
> www.TucsonEV.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EV <ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org> On Behalf Of Cor van de Water via
> EV
> > Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 7:11 PM
> > To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > Cc: Cor van de Water <cor.vandewa...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [EVDL] $405.00 EV charging solution for apartments
> >
> > Hi Rush, clear!
> > Though many EVs do not lock the J1772 plug, so unless the owner took care
> > to somehow lock it, or if the vehicle provides for the lock (like in
> Europe, where
> > the EV'er brings the cable and thus wants it to lock into their EV) any
> thief can
> > simply walk away with the complete EVSE.
> > Likely the reason the NEMA 14-50 is not protected either is because it
> is only
> > powered with the App, so there is no problem of stealing power. And
> stealing
> > the EVSE is not the problem of this project ;-)
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 4:46 PM <e...@tucsonev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cor,
> > >
> > > Nope, sorry didn't misunderstand the project at all. Let me explain my
> > concern more simply.
> > > 1. EV owner will drive up and plug in his/her/their EVSE (or standard
> mobile
> > charger as you call it), start charging and go to his $500k-$1m Condo.
> > > 2. 'a short while later' nefarious guy/gal/person will unplug the
> 14-50 Plug
> > from the 14-50 Outlet since it is not locked in place.
> > > 3. Nefarious guy/gal/person will take his Klien/Craftsman/Harbor
> Freight
> > wire/cable cutter and cut the cord as close as possible to the J1772
> type 1 or
> > 2/Tesla Plug/Gun.
> > > 4. Nefarious guy/gal/person will walk/run/sneak away with a EVSE(or
> > standard mobile charger as you call it) but with the EV Plug/gun cut off.
> > > 5. Nefarious guy/gal/person now has the choice of a) selling the
> copper, b)
> > selling the EVSE(or standard mobile charger as you call it) but with the
> EV
> > Plug/gun cut off on eBay/Marketplace/Craigslist or c) getting a new J1772
> > type 1 or 2/Tesla Plug/Gun and either using it or selling it as a
> complete
> > working unit.
> > > 6. If I/TucsonEV start getting requests to attach a new J1772 Plug on
> the end
> > of a 'my dog chewed it off' EVSE, then I'll know where it comes from.
> > >
> > > Capice?
> > >
> > > Rush Dougherty
> > > TucsonEV
> > > www.TucsonEV.com
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: EV <ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org> On Behalf Of Cor van de Water
> > > > via EV
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 11:14 PM
> > > > To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > > > Cc: Cor van de Water <cor.vandewa...@gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [EVDL] $405.00 EV charging solution for apartments
> > > >
> > > > Rush, I think you misunderstood the project. What it provides is
> > > > only a charging outlet, not an EVSE. Each standard NEMA 14-50 can be
> > > > activated using a special App and no more than 6 residents can be
> > > > charging at the same time, if they all draw 40 Amps which they
> > > > should
> > > > - because the charging is organised in a queue: if you want to
> > > > change, you request and are given a position in the queue, which are
> > > > filled and (re-) allocated as the 300A service they have comes
> > > > available for charging. Since each outlet is 50A, only 6 can be
> > > > powered up at the same time, dividing the
> > > > 300 in 6 chunks of 50A. What you plug *into* your charging outlet is
> > > > a standard mobile charger, so if someone steals a "charging cord"
> > > > then it is the complete EVSE, simply unplugged from the NEMA 14-50
> > > > wall outlet. So, no charging cords without plugs as you suggested.
> > > > The smart thing of course is the queuing and scheduling of 90
> > > > outlets into 6 active ones at any time, so they can have a 300A
> > > > service to start with. I am sure than once EV ownership increases,
> > > > they can upgrade their service and power more outlets at the same
> time.
> > > > Hope this clarifies,
> > > > Cor.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 7:49 PM Rush via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That's a great project especially since it profits from the hefty
> > > > > $2,000 per unit utility credit from Peninsula Clean Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides the app problem brought up by Electrek, hopefully the
> > > > > security is pretty good (which it probably is considering the
> > > > > Condo units cost between
> > > > > $500k-$1m) so that nefarious people can't sneak in and just unplug
> > > > > the
> > > > > 14-50 from the Pando unit, cut the EV cord shy of the Plug and run
> > > > > off with an almost perfectly good EVSE. All it needs is a new Plug
> > > > > put on the EV
> > > > cord!
> > > > >
> > > > > If I start getting various people wanting a new plug put on their
> > > > > EVSE that somehow doesn't have a plug already on it, I guess I'll
> > > > > know where it came from...
> > > > >
> > > > > Rush Dougherty
> > > > > TucsonEV
> > > > > 1014 E King St
> > > > > www.TucsonEV.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: EV <ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org> On Behalf Of Lawrence
> > > > > > Rhodes via EV
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 9:41 AM
> > > > > > To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List <ev@lists.evdl.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Lawrence Rhodes <primobass...@sbcglobal.net>
> > > > > > Subject: [EVDL] $405.00 EV charging solution for apartments
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://electrek.co/2024/12/04/how-one-condo-complex-installed-e
> > > > > > v- charging-for-just-405-per-parking-spot/ Bring your own cord
> > > > > > solution.
> > > > > > Lawrence Rhodes
> > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> > > > > > scrubbed...
> > > > > > URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-
> > > > > > evdl.org/attachments/20241205/0afab7d5/attachment.htm>
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO
> > > > > > and CC fields
> > > > > > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and
> > > > > CC fields
> > > > > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and
> > > > CC fields
> > > > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> > No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> > HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20241207/37808065/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/

Reply via email to