dev  

Messages by Thread

• [REVIEW REQUEST] ~10x faster Z-order bit interleaving with a lookup table Gianluca Graziadei
• Views with Multiple Representations Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: Views with Multiple Representations Ryan Blue
  • Re: Views with Multiple Representations Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: Views with Multiple Representations Daniel Weeks
  • Re: Views with Multiple Representations Prashant Singh
  • Re: Views with Multiple Representations Péter Váry
• Request to subscribe to the Dev and Commits List | Iceberg Community Ravi Shekhar
  • Re: Request to subscribe to the Dev and Commits List | Iceberg Community Kevin Liu
• [RESULT][VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Prashant Singh
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Kevin Liu
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Yufei Gu
• Request to review - Pull Request #2951 sahil gupta
• [GCP] Review request: PR #17468 - Add pluggable GCS token credential provider Aman Agrawal
• [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Sung Yun
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Zhenni Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Weimo Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Matt Topol
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Hao Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Shawn Chang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Amit Sharma
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Ruobing Wang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee 전대홍
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Dipankar Mazumdar
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Hongyue Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Nathan Yee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Kevin Liu
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Roy Hasson via dev
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Alex Merced
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee John Zhuge
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Arnav Balyan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Soundararajan, Gokul
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee kurtiscwright
  • Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Rohan Khameshra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Maximilian Michels
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Aastha Agrrawal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee vaquar khan
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Gianluca Graziadei
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Christian Thiel
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Bill Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee hemanth boyina
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee vishnu prakash
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit 2027 - Selection Committee Shekhar Rajak
• [VOTE] [SPEC] Document standard encryption key metadata Alexander Bailey
  • Re: [VOTE] [SPEC] Document standard encryption key metadata Gábor Kaszab
  • Re: [VOTE] [SPEC] Document standard encryption key metadata Gidon Gershinsky
  • Re: [VOTE] [SPEC] Document standard encryption key metadata Alexander Bailey
• File Type: URI Relativization Behavior Russell Spitzer
  • Re: File Type: URI Relativization Behavior kurtiscwright
  • Re: File Type: URI Relativization Behavior Daniel Weeks
  • Re: File Type: URI Relativization Behavior Shawn Chang
  • Re: File Type: URI Relativization Behavior Nitya Kumar Sharma via dev
• [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients rahul mahadev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients Alex Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients Prashant Singh
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Recommend a standard User-Agent format for REST clients Micah Kornfield
• [ANNOUNCE] Iceberg File Type Sync — Wednesday, September 2 @ 10 AM PT / 17:00 UTC Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Iceberg File Type Sync — Wednesday, September 2 @ 10 AM PT / 17:00 UTC Talat Uyarer via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] PyIceberg 0.12 Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] PyIceberg 0.12 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] PyIceberg 0.12 Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] PyIceberg 0.12 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] PyIceberg 0.12 Jared Yu
• [Question] PR Review Helps Needed Xiening Dai
• [QUESTION] RESTTableScan's PlanTableScanRequest has no snapshotId set by default Ma, Limin via dev
• [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Gianluca Graziadei
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Péter Váry
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Gianluca Graziadei
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Gianluca Graziadei
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Field ID tracking for non-materialized columns in v4 Péter Váry
• [Discuss] Support validate-from-snapshot-id for MERGE hemanth boyina
• [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Prashant Singh
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Nevin Zheng
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec huaxin gao
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Gianluca Graziadei
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Holden Karau
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec John Zhuge
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Steven Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec William Hyun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Hongyue Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Bryan Keller
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Qiegang Long
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Sung Yun
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Honah J.
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec kurtiscwright
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Amogh Jahagirdar
  • Re: [VOTE] Finer grained read restrictions in the Iceberg REST Catalog spec Prashant Singh
• [DISCUSS][SPEC] Simplify Avro timestamp types Sergei Nikolaev
  • Re: [DISCUSS][SPEC] Simplify Avro timestamp types Fokko Driesprong
• [DISCUSS] Collations: file prunability across engines on different ICU versions Andrei Tserakhau via dev
• [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Matt Topol
  • Re: [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Xuanwo
  • Re: [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Sung Yun
  • Re: [VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Kevin Liu
  • [RESULT][VOTE][Terraform] Release Apache Iceberg Terraform Provider v0.1.0 RC3 Matt Topol
• [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Péter Váry
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Manu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Maximilian Michels
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Maximilian Michels
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Péter Váry
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Talat Uyarer via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Maximilian Michels
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Péter Váry
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Flink version support in Iceberg 1.12.0 Maximilian Michels
• [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release Jones, Danny
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release Renjie Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release kurtiscwright
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release Alexander Bailey
• storm-iceberg: new Apache Storm module for low-latency processing and Iceberg ingestion Gianluca Graziadei
• [REMINDER] Register for Lakehouse Day EU 2026 Danica Fine
• [DISCUSS] SF Iceberg meetup in late September Colby Foss
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SF Iceberg meetup in late September Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SF Iceberg meetup in late September Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] SF Iceberg meetup in late September Colby Foss
• [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Alex Stephen via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Jared Yu
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Xuanwo
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Yuya Ebihara
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Kevin Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Sung Yun
  • Re: [VOTE] PyIceberg 0.12.0rc2 Alex Stephen via dev
• GSoC 2026 — Wrapping Up and Continuing with Iceberg Varun Lakhyani
  • Re: GSoC 2026 — Wrapping Up and Continuing with Iceberg Anurag Mantripragada
• [RESULT][VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Neelesh Salian
• Review request: 3 PRs improving equality delete support in Spark Sergei Nikolaev
• [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Marco Kroll
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Leonid Lygin via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Gábor Kaszab
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Leonid Lygin via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Gábor Kaszab
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Anoop Johnson
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Gábor Kaszab
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Leonid Lygin via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Marco Kroll
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] _pos column in efficient column updates in Iceberg Marco Kroll
• [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Matt Butrovich
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Shawn Chang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Renjie Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Manu Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Shawn Chang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Gabriel Musat
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Renjie Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Xuanwo
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Andy Grove
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Renjie Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository kurtiscwright
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Rust: moving the DataFusion integration into a separate repository Kevin Liu
• [Discuss] Add data-file size totals to manifest_list entries hemanth boyina
• [DISCUSS] Sort-key overlap that size-based compaction cannot see (#17489, PR #17504) heekyung Kim
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Sort-key overlap that size-based compaction cannot see (#17489, PR #17504) Anurag Mantripragada
• [DISCUSS] Handling existing position deletes with row data in maintenance actions Hongyue Zhang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Handling existing position deletes with row data in maintenance actions Hongyue Zhang
• [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Andrei Tserakhau via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Sung Yun
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Anurag Mantripragada
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Xin Huang via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Soundararajan, Gokul
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Hongyue Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Anoop Johnson
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Tanmay Rauth
  • Re: [VOTE] Create the apache/iceberg-verification repository Amit Sharma

• Earlier messages