On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:43:58AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > >From two places: > > 1) You haven't suggested anything to do, and > 2) You proposed an amendment which is a "do nothing" resolution.
The only way this makes any sense is if by "do nothing" you mean "do nothing to get rid of non-free". But that's dishonest, because that's equivalent to claiming that the only actions that exist are the actions you're advocating. If you can't even acknowledge that other opinions exist, I can easily see why you're having so much trouble talking about your reasons for your opinions. -- Raul
