On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:13:43PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Out of main and into? And latest news report on this spoke of at least > > 6 more month. > > As I said, time delay doesn't bother me. Latest reports said that > movement may happen. Bugs have been filed against the relevant > packages. > > > Well, the problem here is where you draw the line. what is acceptable in > > non-free and what is not. I would prefer a case by case analysis. > > Sure, some of that is probably necessary regardless. The kind of > compromise I might be content with would involve some independent > review of the question. > > > Also, i think you forgot my own proposal, which was then gone into > > Raul's one, and later abandoned in the many iterations thereof. > > Well, you didn't push your proposal enough to want it to be on the
Well, as said, i am not confortable in english writting enough for such formal things, and i have received no support whatsoever from you or others, even if i asked for it. And at first, Raul's proposal perfectly corresponded to mine, but then it got lost. > ballot. If you wanted that bigger ballot; if people wanted something > there that wasn't being offered, why did they not propose something? Actually, i was going to propose two ammendment the exact morning i received the ballot, and no, i suppose it is too late. > Instead we got the "reaffirm non-free" resolution, which is about as > vacant as I can imagine. Well, it is nice to have, and i seconded it. > I wish you hadn't allowed your own proposal to get co-opted into > Raul's. And i wish you had helped me get the right wording on it. Too late now anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther
