On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:47:54PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:40:39AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Well, non-free stuff is evil, and having it packaged is a threat to free > > > > stuff in the long run, don't you think so ? > > > > > > Who has been saying this? > > > > I just did. I believe it is true also. I also think that the FSF would > > agree with me on this, not entirely sure though. > > Weird. If it were true, then why package free stuff? Why are you
I suppose you mean non-free here. > doing something you think is evil? Because i believe the time of confrontation has not yet come, and that the moment to remove non-free from the debian infrastructure (see how heavy this construction is over the simpler from debian, which you choose to misunderstood). There is no alternative to non-free hardware today, so there is not really much we can do about this. But all the rest of the non-free software, by all means, get ride of it. Friendly, Sven Luther
