* Thomas Bushnell, BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040308 21:40]: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No. If you are not satisfied with either text, you can vote for > > "further discussion". But if the "keep non-free" is the result of this > > vote, than _please_ don't discuss any more after that. It is decided > > than, and let's get back to our work after this GR. > No, the "keep non-free" alternative does not contain any provisions > limiting future discussion. It is also at best a "keep non-free for > now" option. It also does not contain any provision limiting future flaming by me to anyone who revives that discussion. It is also a "please let us go back to work" option. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
