Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Out of main and into? And latest news report on this spoke of at least > 6 more month.
As I said, time delay doesn't bother me. Latest reports said that movement may happen. Bugs have been filed against the relevant packages. > Well, the problem here is where you draw the line. what is acceptable in > non-free and what is not. I would prefer a case by case analysis. Sure, some of that is probably necessary regardless. The kind of compromise I might be content with would involve some independent review of the question. > Also, i think you forgot my own proposal, which was then gone into > Raul's one, and later abandoned in the many iterations thereof. Well, you didn't push your proposal enough to want it to be on the ballot. If you wanted that bigger ballot; if people wanted something there that wasn't being offered, why did they not propose something? Instead we got the "reaffirm non-free" resolution, which is about as vacant as I can imagine. I wish you hadn't allowed your own proposal to get co-opted into Raul's. Thomas
