On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:31:47AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This would mean, not having a relative small, and negatively viewed > > non-free repository on the debian archive, but an officially recognized > > proliferation of third party non-free packages we have no control on. > > If people want that, they can have it now. Having non-free in Debian > does not prevent it from also existing elsewhere. > > Moreover, the whole point is to *not* have it be officially > recognized.
And you seriously thing that a non-free.org, being setup by debian people in the wake of the non-free removal vote, will not be considered as having official endorsement, especially given the opinion of at least two of the three DPL candidates on this issue ? Friendly, Sven Luther
