On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:56:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:26:39PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:34:11AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > I don' think it's a professional attitude if the RM has given up > > > talking to the maintainer of xfree86. Please, Anthony, adjust your > > > attitude, or ask someone else to be the RM. > > Ah, what I love about Debian is just how _rewarding_ it is to contribute. > Indeed; how do you suppose I felt today when I learned -- apparently > long after the fact -- that the Release Manager had placed an embargo on > his communications with me in that official capacity?
Given that you hadn't noticed it, it seems hard to see how it's caused any problems. Why, you'd almost think that having a team working on release management issues was a good thing. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
