debian-legal
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Date
2022/08/03
Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant?
Mihai Moldovan
2022/08/03
Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant?
Ben Westover
2022/07/30
Re: Need license clarification
Dima Kogan
2022/07/30
Re: Need license clarification
Paul Wise
2022/07/30
Need license clarification
Dima Kogan
2022/07/15
Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok?
Paul Wise
2022/07/15
Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok?
Yadd
2022/07/15
Expat-like license - DFSG-ok?
julien . puydt
2022/07/05
Re: Advice about a package fork (displaycal)
Francesco Poli
2022/07/04
Advice about a package fork (displaycal)
Christian Marillat
2022/06/30
Data is showing
victoryschool00057
2022/06/27
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Paul Wise
2022/06/27
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Stephan Verbücheln
2022/06/27
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Simon McVittie
2022/06/27
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Sam Hartman
2022/06/27
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Sebastian Crane
2022/06/26
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Tobias Frost
2022/06/26
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Stephan Verbücheln
2022/06/26
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Sebastian Crane
2022/06/26
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Marcos Talau
2022/06/26
Re: Binary file inside fruit package
Walter Landry
2022/06/26
Binary file inside fruit package
Marcos Talau
2022/06/16
Re: Using Debian as the base for a commercial product
J.B. Nicholson
2022/06/15
Using Debian as the base for a commercial product
Дмитрий Разваров
2022/06/07
Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license
Francesco Poli
2022/06/07
Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license
Sebastian Crane
2022/06/07
Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license
Antoine Beaupré
2022/06/07
a quick review of the timescaledb license
Antoine Beaupré
2022/05/25
OpenLDAP d/copyright overhaul
Sergio Durigan Junior
2022/05/13
Re: Re: Gibraltar
Orange Lofton
2022/05/13
Re: Re: Urgent: Mirroring of encryption software in the USA
Orange Lofton
2022/03/17
Unsere lösung für die kommenden tage
4u2move - Zusammenklappbares E-Bike
2022/03/01
Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant?
Paul Wise
2022/03/01
Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant?
David Given
2022/03/01
Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant?
Fab Stz
2022/02/28
Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant?
David Given
2022/02/28
MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant?
Fab Stz
2022/02/01
Re: Legal advice regarding the NEW queue
Jonathan Carter
2022/02/01
Legal advice regarding the NEW queue
Stephan Lachnit
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Maxime Chambonnet
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Russ Allbery
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Jonathan Carter
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Jonathan Carter
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Pirate Praveen
2022/01/31
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Stephan Lachnit
2022/01/30
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue
Russ Allbery
2022/01/30
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))
Francesco Poli
2022/01/26
Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))
Philip Hands
2022/01/25
Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))
Andreas Tille
2022/01/25
Bug#1004341: mercurial-common: please add contrib/zsh_completion to d/copyright
Daniel Shahaf
2022/01/22
Re: GihHub style logo license
Yadd
2022/01/22
Re: GihHub style logo license
Jérémy Lal
2022/01/22
GihHub style logo license
Yadd
2022/01/06
Re: Question about Debian redistribution
Paul Wise
2022/01/05
Re: Question about Debian redistribution
Navtej Bhatti
2022/01/05
Re: Question about Debian redistribution
Mihai Moldovan
2022/01/05
Re: Question about Debian redistribution
Paul Wise
2022/01/04
Re: Question about Debian redistribution
Walter Landry
2022/01/04
Question about Debian redistribution
Navtej Bhatti
2021/12/23
Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant?
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/12/22
Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant?
Jan Gru
2021/12/22
Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant?
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/12/21
Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant?
Jan Gru
2021/12/20
Re: Bug#1001894: ITP: spacecadetpinball -- Decompilation and port of "3D Pinball for Windows - Space Cadet"
lucylikesyourface
2021/12/08
Remittance Advice - Debian-legal
Account Payable
2021/12/01
We are the factory of cue product from China #gqS7PpVr #
caleb
2021/11/04
Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
Daniel Leidert
2021/10/18
Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG
Paul Wise
2021/10/18
Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG
Nicholas Guriev
2021/10/17
Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG
Walter Landry
2021/10/17
Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG
Nicholas Guriev
2021/10/16
Re: Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software
Walter Landry
2021/10/16
Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software
. Cubik65536
2021/10/08
Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL?
Daniel Hakimi
2021/10/08
Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL?
Benito Garcia
2021/10/08
MLCC & IC &Transistors & Diodes from CN
Tina Tang
2021/10/07
Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
Paul Wise
2021/10/07
Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
John Scott
2021/10/07
Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
Walter Landry
2021/10/07
Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
Francesco Poli
2021/10/07
Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments
Dominik George
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Tom Dial
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Peter Ehlert
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/24
Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Jonathan Carter
2021/09/24
Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums
Chuck Zmudzinski
2021/09/14
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Paul Wise
2021/09/14
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Dhavan V
2021/09/13
Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Protesilaos Stavrou
2021/09/13
Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes
Dhavan V
2021/09/13
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/12
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Sam Hartman
2021/09/11
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/09/07
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/07
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Lucas Nussbaum
2021/09/06
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Felix Lechner
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/09/03
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Sam Hartman
2021/09/03
Re: I need help my acct was hacked
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/09/02
I need help my acct was hacked
Scarlett Kelley
2021/08/31
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/08/31
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Francesco Poli
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Tobias Frost
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Jeffrey H. Johnson
2021/08/30
Re: List of journal
Walter Landry
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Ole Tange
2021/08/30
List of journal
Bastien ROUCARIES
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Andreas Tille
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Felix Lechner
2021/08/30
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Francesco Poli
2021/08/30
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Tobias Frost
2021/08/29
Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted
Andreas Tille
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Walter Landry
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
J.B. Nicholson
2021/08/29
Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
J.B. Nicholson
2021/08/29
Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian
Jeffrey H. Johnson
2021/08/11
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Pierre Gruet
2021/08/10
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Walter Landry
2021/08/10
Re: Concern about a Sun license
Francesco Poli
2021/08/10
Concern about a Sun license
Pierre Gruet
2021/07/29
"Andronix" app reselling paid version of Debian, potentially violating GPL and Debian trademarks?
Rishub
2021/07/26
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Francesco Poli
2021/07/26
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Francesco Poli
2021/07/25
Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Walter Landry
2021/07/25
Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0
Guilherme Xavier
2021/07/14
Re: cowsay questionable files
Bone Baboon
2021/07/13
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Mihai Moldovan
2021/07/12
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Sam Hartman
2021/07/12
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Bone Baboon
2021/07/11
cowsay questionable files
Bone Baboon
2021/07/07
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Jonathan Carter
2021/07/04
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Daniel Hakimi
2021/07/04
Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
Paul Wise
2021/07/04
Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye
jorkanofaln
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Ole Streicher
2021/06/21
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Francesco Poli
2021/06/21
Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Sam Hartman
2021/06/21
MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD?
Marc Haber
2021/06/18
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Paul Wise
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Michael Lustfield
2021/06/18
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/17
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Michael Lustfield
2021/06/17
Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Sam Hartman
2021/06/17
Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C)
Diego M. Rodriguez
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/06/03
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Sam Hartman
2021/06/02
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Walter Landry
2021/06/02
Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding
Bastian Germann
2021/05/29
Re: Rust trademark policy
Walter Landry
2021/05/29
Rust trademark policy
Bone Baboon
2021/05/16
DATAS PROTECTION AND FRAMEWORK SUPPORT
HEYJEY789
2021/05/11
GPL and embedded software in a custom ISO
Sileno de Oliveira Brito
2021/05/10
Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Paul Wise
2021/05/10
Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Sam Hartman
2021/05/10
Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct?
Alexander Mazuruk
2021/03/28
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Paul Wise
2021/03/28
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
2021/03/03
Debian-legal, Nice to know that you do camera business. #JllvJFSW #
kevin
2021/02/28
New Year Greetings!
Cherry
2021/02/22
Re: LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)?
Walter Landry
2021/02/22
LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)?
Andreas Metzler
2021/02/03
Debian-legal, look forward to our cooperation! 02/04/2021 12:03:34 jfnvqmgr
zhenli
2021/01/27
COUROMODA 2021 - Attendees List
mary smith
2021/01/25
I am a link builder & I've a good number of quality sites
Jack Charlie
2021/01/23
Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Dennis Filder
2021/01/23
Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Bastian Blank
2021/01/23
gnome-screensaver copyright issues
Dennis Filder
2021/01/20
Re: License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package
Francesco Poli
2021/01/20
License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package
Marc Haber
2021/01/08
Geant4 license (again).
Stephan Lachnit
2021/01/08
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Francesco Poli
2021/01/08
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Andrew M.A. Cater
2021/01/07
Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
2021/01/06
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Francesco Poli
2021/01/04
Re: Copyright of debian/*
Christoph Biedl
2021/01/03
Re: Bug#979095: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
Matthew Vernon
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
David Prévot
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Jim Wright
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
John Scott
2021/01/02
Re: Copyright of debian/*
John Scott
2021/01/02
Copyright of debian/*
Matthew Vernon
2021/01/02
Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Simon McVittie
2021/01/01
GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline
Bastian Germann
2020/12/12
Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
Florian Weimer
2020/12/10
Looking for a Minecraft Server?
PUSCraft
2020/12/10
do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL?
Nicholas D Steeves
2020/12/07
Re: Haftungsausschluss
Geert Stappers
2020/11/16
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
2020/11/16
Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?
Hayden Barnes
2020/11/16
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
Paul Wise
2020/11/15
Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license.
David Bannon
Earlier messages
Later messages