core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8354320: Changes to jpackage.md cause pandoc warning Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v9] Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v46] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8332249: Micro-optimize Method.hashCode [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8344708: Compiler Implementation of Module Import Declarations [v5] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8344708: Compiler Implementation of Module Import Declarations [v5] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Integrated: 8354266: Fix non-UTF-8 text encoding Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque duke
  • Integrated: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354111: JavaDoc states that Iterator.remove() is linear in the LinkedBlockingDeque Chen Liang
• RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v4] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v4] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v5] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v5] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v5] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v5] Hans Boehm
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v6] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v6] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v6] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v6] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v6] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v7] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v8] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v8] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v8] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v9] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests [v9] Kim Barrett
  • Integrated: 8305186: Reference.waitForReferenceProcessing should be more accessible to tests Brent Christian
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v31] Thomas Schatzl
• RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8354273: Restore even more pointless unicode characters to ASCII [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage [v7] Julian Waters
• Integrated: 8341402: BigDecimal's square root optimization fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Luca Kellermann
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v56] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v55] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v54] Per Minborg
• RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8354189: Remove JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys on Windows Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v53] Rémi Forax
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v33] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v33] Roberto Castañeda Lozano
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v33] Roberto Castañeda Lozano
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v33] Roberto Castañeda Lozano
• java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? Remi Forax
  • Re: java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? Chen Liang
  • Re: java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? Glavo
  • Re: java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? forax
  • Re: java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? forax
  • Re: java.lang.String hashCode and @Stable ? Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v32] Thomas Schatzl
• Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v52] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351565: Implement JEP 502: Stable Values (Preview) [v52] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods [v2] Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8341641: Make %APPDATA% and %LOCALAPPDATA% env variables available in *.cfg files [v10] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive [v6] Timofei Pushkin
  • Re: RFR: 8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive [v6] Timofei Pushkin
  • Re: RFR: 8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8315130: java.lang.IllegalAccessError when processing classlist to create CDS archive [v6] Timofei Pushkin
• Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v6] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v6] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8350075: Performance difference between SegmentAllocator methods Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Integrated: 8351462: Improve robustness of String concatenation Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8354138: LinkedBlockingDeque allows us to exceed size with addAll() kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354138: LinkedBlockingDeque allows us to exceed size with addAll() Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354138: LinkedBlockingDeque allows us to exceed size with addAll() kabutz
• RFR: 8354076: LinkedBlockingDeque offer() creates nodes even if capacity has been reached kabutz
  • Re: RFR: 8354076: LinkedBlockingDeque offer() creates nodes even if capacity has been reached Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8354076: LinkedBlockingDeque offer() creates nodes even if capacity has been reached kabutz
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v4] Michael McMahon
• Withdrawn: 8069345: (fs) FileTreeWalker throws NotDirectoryException on file junction points duke

• Earlier messages
• Later messages