core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v8] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v9] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v9] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v10] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's man page does not document the --compress option correctly [v11] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v12] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v13] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v14] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v15] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v16] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v17] Ana Maria Mihalceanu
  • Re: RFR: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly [v17] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8321139: jlink's compression plugin doesn't handle -c option correctly Ana Maria Mihalceanu
• RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Jorn Vernee
  • Integrated: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8372002: VarHandle for receiver's superclass instance fields fails describeConstable Maurizio Cimadamore
• Sharing more of my experience with a custom Gatherer (windowBy) David Alayachew
  • Re: [External] : Sharing more of my experience with a custom Gatherer (windowBy) Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v28] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v27] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v14] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v26] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v26] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v9] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
• Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? Stuart Marks
  • Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? David Alayachew
  • Re: [External] : Re: Could we add headList and tailList methods to j.u.List? Stuart Marks
• Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v13] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v13] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371960: Missing null check in AnnotatedType annotation accessor methods Chen Liang
• RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs [v6] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8371953: Document null handling in core reflection APIs Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v25] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v25] Roger Riggs
• JDK-8370887 DelayScheduler Bug Discussion Kent Dong
  • Re: JDK-8370887 DelayScheduler Bug Discussion Viktor Klang
  • Re: JDK-8370887 DelayScheduler Bug Discussion Alan Bateman
  • Re: JDK-8370887 DelayScheduler Bug Discussion Kent Dong
• Re: RFR: 8365675: Add String Unicode Case-Folding Support [v9] Xueming Shen
• Re: RFR: 8357728: Optimize Executable#synthesizeAllParams [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8367585: Move Utf8Entry length validation earlier [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367585: Prevent creation of unrepresentable Utf8Entry [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367585: Prevent creation of unrepresentable Utf8Entry [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8367585: Prevent creation of unrepresentable Utf8Entry [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8367585: Move Utf8Entry length validation earlier [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367585: Move Utf8Entry length validation earlier [v2] Chen Liang
• Withdrawn: 8368831: ResourceParsingClassHierarchyResolver.getClassInfo(ClassDesc) throws unspecified UncheckedIOException Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8368831: ResourceParsingClassHierarchyResolver.getClassInfo(ClassDesc) throws unspecified UncheckedIOException [v4] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v24] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v24] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v24] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v24] Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v23] Shaojin Wen
• Withdrawn: 8359424: Eliminate table lookup in Integer/Long toHexString duke
• Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v12] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v12] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v12] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8353835: Implement JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean Final [v12] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: check sysinfo return values [v3] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v4] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v5] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v5] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v6] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v6] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8333871: Check sysinfo return values [v6] Martin Doerr
  • Integrated: 8333871: Check return values of sysinfo Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8366224: Introduce DecimalDigits.appendPair for efficient two-digit formatting and refactor DateTimeHelper [v22] Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns erifan
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v3] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v4] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v5] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v6] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8370863: VectorAPI: Optimize the VectorMaskCast chain in specific patterns [v7] Eric Fang
• RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method [v2] Brent Christian
  • Integrated: 8371748: Remove the (empty) ThreadPoolExecutor.finalize() method Brent Christian
• RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8346944: Update Unicode Data Files to 17.0.0 Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8357551: RISC-V: support CMoveF/D vectorization Hamlin Li
  • Re: RFR: 8357551: RISC-V: support CMoveF/D vectorization Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8357551: RISC-V: support CMoveF/D vectorization [v2] Hamlin Li
  • Re: RFR: 8357551: RISC-V: support CMoveF/D vectorization [v2] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8357551: RISC-V: support CMoveF/D vectorization [v3] Hamlin Li

• Earlier messages
• Later messages