Handicaps *should* show you the difference in performance.  These are from
PHRF NE.  You should be able to compare the 34+ and Sabre 386 from your
experience (apparently fairly similar).  My experience sailing the 35-3
(another Rob Ball design) is that windward performance is great; reaching
and downwind are weaker points (but not bad, mind you).  Where in LIS are
you based?

Tim
Mojito
C&C 35-3
Branford, CT


*Boat*

*PHRF NE Base*

C&C 37/40R

63

C&C 37/40XL

66

C&C 115

66

C&C 37/40+

75

C&C 34/36R

81

C&C 34/36XL

84

Sabre 386

84

C&C 34/36

87

Sabre 386 WK

93

C&C 38-3

102

C&C 35-3 (my boat)

114

C&C 38-3 CB

117



On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:33 PM, j...@svpaws.net <j...@svpaws.net> wrote:

> Any thoughts on the late 80's vintage 38? I'm thinking about one for a
> full restoration and ultimately to be used for coastal cruising (long
> island sound), casual phrf racing and limited offshore runs (Bermuda, BVI,
> etc).
>
> A little background.  I currently sail a Sabre 386 but am uninspired by
> the performance.  Build quality is great.  I've owned 2 Rob Ball C &C's in
> the past, each for about 7 years - a 34+ and a 51xl.
>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to