I remember more than one Swiftsure when the conditions were too light for the 
drifter so we shifted to the Dazy staysail and started passing boats.

Andrew Burton
61 W Narragansett
Newport, RI 
USA    02840

http://sites.google.com/site/andrewburtonyachtservices/
+401 965-5260

On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Martin DeYoung <mdeyo...@deyoungmfg.com> wrote:

> I fondly recall sitting to leeward holding the drifter’s clew by hand while 
> going backwards in the current.  Sometimes this was in the fog or late at 
> night.  Often when is was 0dark 30, cold and damp and I was changing back and 
> forth between a drifter and a ½ oz spinny I would longingly gaze towards 
> shore and wonder what the poor people were doing.
>  
> I salvaged a lightweight spinnaker staysail from a dumpster to use as a 
> “windseeker” in goose egg conditions. (I have a picture on my office wall of 
> a C&C 39 flying the same staysail in 1977.)  For drifter conditions I bought 
> ($500) a lightly used very light Mylar/Kevlar laminate that is a little 
> undersized but it was only $500.  When conditions are changing quickly we use 
> Calypso’s light #1 which does very well from 3 to 10 knots TWS.
>  
> Martin
> Calypso
> 1970 C&C 43
> Seattle
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Gary 
> Nylander
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:51 PM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review
>  
> Any of you old enough to remember the 'drifters'? We had one in the late 
> '60's (friend's boat) that was about 180%. If you flattened that out and made 
> it with a bit more of a luff/leech consideration, you would have an asym.
>  
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin DeYoung
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review
>  
> Maybe the PHRF rating people see an asso much like a 150+% genny.
>  
> I know when I stretch back Calypso’s 25 year old ¾ oz spinny on a tight reach 
> the clew is back where a 160 – 170% headsails would be.
>  
> Martin
> Calypso
> 1970 C&C 43
> Seattle
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Joel 
> Aronson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:56 PM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review
>  
> I'm a little surprised too.  We are assuming the pole = J.  I don't know if 
> asyms are necessarily smaller.  There are some big-axx Code 0's out there.  
> The penalty may be due, in part, to the greater efficiency on a beam reach.  
>  
> Joel
> 35/3
> Annapolis
>  
> 
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Chuck S <cscheaf...@comcast.net> wrote:
> I appreciate the analysis of when each sail is preferred, reaching vs 
> running, but isn't an asym smaller than a full spinnake?  I could see getting 
> a rating hit for a sprit, just like a pole longer than J.  Can't see why 
> using an asym with standard pole would hurt his rating?  Is he mounting the 
> pole further forward?   I think there is more to this.
> 
> Chuck
> Resolute
> 1990 C&C 34R
> Atlantic City, NJ
> From: "Gary Nylander" <gnylan...@atlanticbb.net>
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:27:22 PM
> 
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review
> 
> I checked with my expert - Cal 40 with both regular and asym. Flies both from 
> the pole.
>  
> He gets a 3 second hit for the asym (Ches Bay) and does not think it is worth 
> it for sailing on the Chesapeake (not a lot of east/west winds for reaching). 
> But, finds it is very handy for Newport to Bermuda ("it was 'the bomb' last 
> time").
>  
> Figure that the 3 seconds is always so there has to be a lot of reaching to 
> make up for the windward and leeward parts of a race.
>  
> And, he says it is a b...h to jibe. Must go all the way out in front of the 
> boat as you are turning the boat - has many opportunities to tangle up. And, 
> a heavy boat like his doesn't get that quick acceleration that a light one 
> may.
>  
> He's hoping that ChesBay PHRF will re-think their policy.
>  
> Gary Nylander
> St. Michaels MD
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to