Dear Jay and Sean, We do not believe we have heard from you regarding this document's readiness for publication. Please review the files below and let us know if any further updates are needed or if the document is ready for publication.
The updated XML file is here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml The updated output files are here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html This diff file shows all changes made to date: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 Best regards, RFC Editor/kc > On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Jay, > > Our files now reflect 'bringing in additional hallway seating’ (Section > 4.4.2). Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or if > you approve the document in its current form. > > —FILES (please refresh)— > > The updated XML file is here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml > > The updated output files are here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html > > This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html > > This diff file shows all changes made to date: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html > > Please contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the > document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author prior > to moving forward in the publication process. > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/kc > > >> On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Jay Daley <j...@staff.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 14 Jan 2025, at 10:32, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jay, >>> >>> We have updated our files based on your feedback (note that "BCP 226" will >>> be added during the publication process). >> >> >> Thanks >> >>> We have an additional question. >>> >>> 1) Regarding the following text, would option A or B perhaps be better than >>> using ‘hiring’ or ‘renting’? >>> >>> Original: >>> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>> a new practice of hiring in hallway seating whenever >>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>> >>> Perhaps: >>> A) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>> a new practice of supplying in hallway seating whenever >>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>> or >>> >>> B) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>> a new practice of making in hallway seating available >>> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >> >> To avoid hiring or renting, my preference is: >> >> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >> a new practice of bringing in additional hallway seating >> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >> >> Let me know if that works for you. >> >> Jay >> >> >> -- >> Jay Daley >> IETF Executive Director >> exec-direc...@ietf.org >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
