Just one question: Could this:
The choice of a main hotel and negotiation of the network for that hotel are more complicated be this: The choice of a main hotel and negotiation for the network at that hotel are more complicated spt > On Jan 21, 2025, at 2:55 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Hi Jay, > > We have updated both addresses to reflect “Wilmington” and have noted your > approval on the AUTH48 status page > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712). > > We now await approval from Sean prior to moving forward with publication. > > The updated XML file is here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml > > The updated output files are here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html > > This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html > > This diff file shows all changes made to date: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html > > For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 > > Best regards, > RFC Editor/kc > >> On Jan 21, 2025, at 11:18 AM, Jay Daley <j...@staff.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Karen >> >> I have reviewed everything and I am happy for this to move to publication. >> >> Jay >> >>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 07:47, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Jay and Sean, >>> >>> We do not believe we have heard from you regarding this document's >>> readiness for publication. Please review the files below and let us know >>> if any further updates are needed or if the document is ready for >>> publication. >>> >>> The updated XML file is here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >>> >>> The updated output files are here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >>> >>> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >>> >>> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >>> >>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> RFC Editor/kc >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Jay, >>>> >>>> Our files now reflect 'bringing in additional hallway seating’ (Section >>>> 4.4.2). Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or >>>> if you approve the document in its current form. >>>> >>>> —FILES (please refresh)— >>>> >>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >>>> >>>> The updated output files are here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >>>> >>>> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >>>> >>>> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >>>> >>>> Please contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the >>>> document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author >>>> prior to moving forward in the publication process. >>>> >>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Jay Daley <j...@staff.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 14 Jan 2025, at 10:32, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jay, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have updated our files based on your feedback (note that "BCP 226" >>>>>> will be added during the publication process). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>>> We have an additional question. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Regarding the following text, would option A or B perhaps be better >>>>>> than using ‘hiring’ or ‘renting’? >>>>>> >>>>>> Original: >>>>>> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>> a new practice of hiring in hallway seating whenever >>>>>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps: >>>>>> A) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>> a new practice of supplying in hallway seating whenever >>>>>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>> or >>>>>> >>>>>> B) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>> a new practice of making in hallway seating available >>>>>> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>> >>>>> To avoid hiring or renting, my preference is: >>>>> >>>>> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>> a new practice of bringing in additional hallway seating >>>>> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know if that works for you. >>>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jay Daley >>>>> IETF Executive Director >>>>> exec-direc...@ietf.org >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jay Daley >> IETF Executive Director >> exec-direc...@ietf.org >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
