Hi Sean, We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712).
We now have all necessary approvals and will move this document forward in the publication process. Thank you for your time! Best regards, RFC Editor/kc > On Jan 22, 2025, at 6:27 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > I approve the document in its current form. > > spt > >> On Jan 22, 2025, at 5:42 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Sean and Jay, >> >> Thank you for your replies. We have updated our files accordingly. Sean, >> please review and let us know if you have any further changes or if you >> approve the document in its current form. >> >> —Files (please refresh)— >> >> The updated XML file is here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >> >> The updated output files are here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >> >> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >> >> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >> >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >> >> Best regards, >> RFC Editor/kc >> >>> On Jan 22, 2025, at 2:07 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just one question: >>> >>> Could this: >>> >>> The choice of a main hotel and negotiation of the network for that hotel >>> are more complicated >>> >>> be this: >>> >>> The choice of a main hotel and negotiation for the network at that hotel >>> are more complicated >>> >>> spt >>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2025, at 2:55 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jay, >>>> >>>> We have updated both addresses to reflect “Wilmington” and have noted your >>>> approval on the AUTH48 status page >>>> (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712). >>>> >>>> We now await approval from Sean prior to moving forward with publication. >>>> >>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >>>> >>>> The updated output files are here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >>>> >>>> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >>>> >>>> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >>>> >>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>> >>>>> On Jan 21, 2025, at 11:18 AM, Jay Daley <j...@staff.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Karen >>>>> >>>>> I have reviewed everything and I am happy for this to move to publication. >>>>> >>>>> Jay >>>>> >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 07:47, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Jay and Sean, >>>>>> >>>>>> We do not believe we have heard from you regarding this document's >>>>>> readiness for publication. Please review the files below and let us >>>>>> know if any further updates are needed or if the document is ready for >>>>>> publication. >>>>>> >>>>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> The updated output files are here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >>>>>> >>>>>> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >>>>>> >>>>>> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >>>>>> >>>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:51 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jay, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Our files now reflect 'bringing in additional hallway seating’ (Section >>>>>>> 4.4.2). Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed >>>>>>> or if you approve the document in its current form. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> —FILES (please refresh)— >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.xml >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The updated output files are here: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.txt >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.pdf >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This diff file shows all changes made during AUTH48: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-auth48diff.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This diff file shows all changes made to date: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9712-diff.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the >>>>>>> document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author >>>>>>> prior to moving forward in the publication process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: >>>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9712 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jan 13, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Jay Daley <j...@staff.ietf.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 14 Jan 2025, at 10:32, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jay, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have updated our files based on your feedback (note that "BCP 226" >>>>>>>>> will be added during the publication process). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have an additional question. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) Regarding the following text, would option A or B perhaps be >>>>>>>>> better than using ‘hiring’ or ‘renting’? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Original: >>>>>>>>> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>>>>> a new practice of hiring in hallway seating whenever >>>>>>>>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Perhaps: >>>>>>>>> A) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>>>>> a new practice of supplying in hallway seating whenever >>>>>>>>> that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> B) The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>>>>> a new practice of making in hallway seating available >>>>>>>>> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To avoid hiring or renting, my preference is: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The IASA has responded to this feedback by adopting >>>>>>>> a new practice of bringing in additional hallway seating >>>>>>>> whenever that provided by the venue is insufficient. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me know if that works for you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jay >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jay Daley >>>>>>>> IETF Executive Director >>>>>>>> exec-direc...@ietf.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jay Daley >>>>> IETF Executive Director >>>>> exec-direc...@ietf.org >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org