Hi, Dan and Kevin. Dan, we have updated your contact information per your note below.
We have noted both of your approvals on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704 The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html Thank you! RFC Editor/lb > On Jan 14, 2025, at 2:29 AM, Kevin Smith, Vodafone <kevin.sm...@vodafone.com> > wrote: > > Please also mark me as Approved – and thanks to all. > Kevin > On Jan 13, 2025, at 2:45 PM, Dan Wing <danw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One minor change -- please remove the street address for my contact > information, as we just closed that building in Santa Clara, so: > > OLD: > Dan Wing > Citrix Systems, Inc. > 4988 Great America Pkwy > Santa Clara, CA 95054 > United States of America > Email: danw...@gmail.com > > NEW: > Dan Wing > Citrix Systems, Inc. > United States of America > Email: danw...@gmail.com > > > > The existing title page abbreviation for my employer is fine as-is ("Citrix"). > > With that, please mark me as Approved. > > Thanks! > -d > > >> On Jan 13, 2025, at 10:23 AM, Lynne Bartholomew >> <lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, Ben and Éric. >> >> Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below. >> >> Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48 >> status page: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704 >> >> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html >> >> Thank you! >> >> RFC Editor/lb >> >> >>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Lynne, >>> The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and >>> editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I >>> approve these changes. >>> Regards >>> -éric >> >>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Section 2: >>>>> >>>>> OLD: >>>>> Validated Split Horizon: Indicates that a split-horizon >>>>> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the >>>>> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized >>>>> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. >>>>> >>>>> NEW: >>>>> Validated Split Horizon: A split-horizon >>>>> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the >>>>> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized >>>>> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. >>> >>>> [rfced] We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment >>>> style used in all four list items. Please let us know > if you would >>>> prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items. >>> >>> Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to >>> parse. Let's try this change: >>> >>> OLD: >>> A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated" >>> if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this >>> resolver to serve its own responses for that name. >>> >>> NEW: >>> A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the >>> affected names and confirmed by the client. >>> >>> --Ben >> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
