> Ben, we have updated this document per your notes below, except for this > item; please advise:
>> Section 1: >> "This specification expects that local DNS servers will be securely >> identified ..." >> -> This statement strikes me as more personifying than is necessary. It's >> also strange because, leaving aside the specification's opinion, I don't >> expect that most local DNS servers will be securely identified. The prior >> text said "this specification relies on ...", in an attempt to convey the >> idea that secure identification is a precondition, not a prediction (as >> implied by the future tense "will be"). Other possible verbs for this >> sentence would be "require" or "assume" (or "applies only to networks where >> the local DNS server is securely identified", etc.). > It's not clear to us how, and where, we should make updates. Please specify, > using "OLD" and "NEW" text. draft-14: This specification relies on securely identified local DNS servers, and checks each local domain hint against a globally valid parent zone. OLD: This specification expects that local DNS servers will be securely identified and that each local domain hint will be checked against a globally valid parent zone. NEW: In this specification, network operators securely identify the local DNS servers, and clients check each local domain hint against a globally valid parent zone.
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
