Hi, Ben and Éric.

Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below.

Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48 
status page:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704

The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html

Thank you!

RFC Editor/lb


> On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Lynne,
>  The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and 
> editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I 
> approve these changes.
>  Regards
>  -éric

> On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com> wrote:
> 
> >> Section 2:
> >>
> >> OLD:
> >>   Validated Split Horizon:  Indicates that a split-horizon
> >>      configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the
> >>      client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized
> >>      this resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
> >>
> >> NEW:
> >>   Validated Split Horizon:  A split-horizon
> >>      configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the
> >>      client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized
> >>      this resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
> 
> > [rfced]  We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment 
> > style used in all four list items.  Please let us know > if you would 
> > prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items.
> 
> Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to parse.  
> Let's try this change:
> 
> OLD:
> A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated" if 
> the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this 
> resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
> 
> NEW:
> A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the 
> affected names and confirmed by the client.
> 
> --Ben


-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to