Hi, Ben and Éric. Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below.
Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704 The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html Thank you! RFC Editor/lb > On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hello Lynne, > The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and > editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I > approve these changes. > Regards > -éric > On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com> wrote: > > >> Section 2: > >> > >> OLD: > >> Validated Split Horizon: Indicates that a split-horizon > >> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the > >> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized > >> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > >> > >> NEW: > >> Validated Split Horizon: A split-horizon > >> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the > >> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized > >> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > > > [rfced] We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment > > style used in all four list items. Please let us know > if you would > > prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items. > > Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to parse. > Let's try this change: > > OLD: > A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated" if > the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this > resolver to serve its own responses for that name. > > NEW: > A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the > affected names and confirmed by the client. > > --Ben -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org