Please also mark me as Approved – and thanks to all. Kevin From: Dan Wing <danw...@gmail.com> Sent: 13 January 2025 22:45 To: Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> Cc: Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com>; Éric Vyncke <evyn...@cisco.com>; Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta....@dmarc.ietf.org>; Kevin Smith, Vodafone <kevin.sm...@vodafone.com>; rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; Tirumaleswar Reddy <kond...@gmail.com>; Ben Schwartz <i...@bemasc.net>; add-...@ietf.org; add-cha...@ietf.org; Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>; auth48archive@rfc-editor.org Subject: Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review
This email originated from outside of the organisation: Verify the sender and content before clicking or downloading. Report this email using Report Message button if unsure. One minor change -- please remove the street address for my contact information, as we just closed that building in Santa Clara, so: OLD: Dan Wing Citrix Systems, Inc. 4988 Great America Pkwy Santa Clara, CA 95054 United States of America Email: danw...@gmail.com<mailto:danw...@gmail.com> NEW: Dan Wing Citrix Systems, Inc. United States of America Email: danw...@gmail.com<mailto:danw...@gmail.com> The existing title page abbreviation for my employer is fine as-is ("Citrix"). With that, please mark me as Approved. Thanks! -d On Jan 13, 2025, at 10:23 AM, Lynne Bartholomew <lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org<mailto:lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org>> wrote: Hi, Ben and Éric. Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below. Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48 status page: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704 The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html Thank you! RFC Editor/lb On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com<mailto:evyn...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hello Lynne, The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I approve these changes. Regards -éric On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com<mailto:bem...@meta.com>> wrote: Section 2: OLD: Validated Split Horizon: Indicates that a split-horizon configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. NEW: Validated Split Horizon: A split-horizon configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. [rfced] We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment style used in all four list items. Please let us know > if you would prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items. Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to parse. Let's try this change: OLD: A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated" if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this resolver to serve its own responses for that name. NEW: A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the affected names and confirmed by the client. --Ben C2 General
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
