Hi, Ben.

We have updated this document per your note below.

The latest files are posted here.  Please refresh your browser:

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html

   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html

Please note that my email address has changed from <lbartholo...@amsl.com> to 
<lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org>.

Thank you!

RFC Editor/lb

> On Jan 6, 2025, at 12:39 PM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ben, we have updated this document per your notes below, except for this 
> > item; please advise:
> 
> >> Section 1:
> >> "This specification expects that local DNS servers will be securely 
> >> identified ..."
> >> -> This statement strikes me as more personifying than is necessary.  It's 
> >> also strange because, leaving aside the specification's opinion, I don't 
> >> expect that most local DNS servers will be securely identified.  The prior 
> >> text said "this specification relies on ...", in an attempt to convey the 
> >> idea that secure identification is a precondition, not a prediction (as 
> >> implied by the future tense "will be").  Other possible verbs for this 
> >> sentence would be "require" or "assume" (or "applies only to networks 
> >> where the local DNS server is securely identified", etc.).
> 
> > It's not clear to us how, and where, we should make updates.  Please 
> > specify, using "OLD" and "NEW" text.
> 
> draft-14:
>    This specification relies on securely identified local DNS servers,
>    and checks each local domain hint against a globally valid parent
>    zone.
> 
> OLD:
>    This specification expects that local DNS servers will be securely 
>    identified and that each local domain hint will be checked against a
>    globally valid parent zone.
> 
> NEW:
>   In this specification, network operators securely identify the local DNS
>   servers, and clients check each local domain hint against a globally
>   valid parent zone.


-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to