One minor change -- please remove the street address for my contact
information, as we just closed that building in Santa Clara, so:
OLD:
Dan Wing
Citrix Systems, Inc.
4988 Great America Pkwy
Santa Clara, CA 95054
United States of America
Email: danw...@gmail.com
NEW:
Dan Wing
Citrix Systems, Inc.
United States of America
Email: danw...@gmail.com
The existing title page abbreviation for my employer is fine as-is ("Citrix").
With that, please mark me as Approved.
Thanks!
-d
> On Jan 13, 2025, at 10:23 AM, Lynne Bartholomew
> <lbartholo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, Ben and Éric.
>
> Ben, we have further updated this document per your note below.
>
> Éric, we have noted your approval for the updates to Section 7 on the AUTH48
> status page:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9704
>
> The latest files are posted here. Please refresh your browser:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.pdf
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704.xml
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-diff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-rfcdiff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-auth48diff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastdiff.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-lastrfcdiff.html
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff1.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9704-xmldiff2.html
>
> Thank you!
>
> RFC Editor/lb
>
>
>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 8:24 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Lynne,
>> The changes in section 7 are indeed borderline between technical and
>> editorial, but they respect my view of the IETF/ADD WG consensus. I.e., I
>> approve these changes.
>> Regards
>> -éric
>
>> On Jan 10, 2025, at 7:31 AM, Ben Schwartz <bem...@meta.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Section 2:
>>>>
>>>> OLD:
>>>> Validated Split Horizon: Indicates that a split-horizon
>>>> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the
>>>> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized
>>>> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
>>>>
>>>> NEW:
>>>> Validated Split Horizon: A split-horizon
>>>> configuration for some name is considered "validated" if the
>>>> client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized
>>>> this resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
>>
>>> [rfced] We added the word "that" in order to keep the sentence-fragment
>>> style used in all four list items. Please let us know > if you would
>>> prefer your complete-sentence style for all four items.
>>
>> Sentence-fragment style is fine, but I find the adjusted text hard to parse.
>> Let's try this change:
>>
>> OLD:
>> A split-horizon configuration that for some name is considered "validated"
>> if the client has confirmed that a parent of that name has authorized this
>> resolver to serve its own responses for that name.
>>
>> NEW:
>> A split-horizon configuration that is authorized by the parents of the
>> affected names and confirmed by the client.
>>
>> --Ben
>
>
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
