On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 22:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > So, for instance, pending proposals and
> > calling CFJs should always be free and unlimited, excluding abuse.
> 
> What a limited view of a very small slice of game history this is.

I think it helps to have an exception for "good of the game" pends and
CFJs, but that it also helps to charge for "I was curious" or "nomic
manouevring"-style proposals and CFJs. (You can make the distinction
via a dependent action or the like.) So I guess my view's somewhere in
between. (And this /is/ based on observations of the game history.)

Of course, a "let's all work together to pay for these bugfixes"
economy could also be interesting, but it makes it hard to make the
economy competitive in other respects.

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to