On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 22:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: > > So, for instance, pending proposals and > > calling CFJs should always be free and unlimited, excluding abuse. > > What a limited view of a very small slice of game history this is.
I think it helps to have an exception for "good of the game" pends and CFJs, but that it also helps to charge for "I was curious" or "nomic manouevring"-style proposals and CFJs. (You can make the distinction via a dependent action or the like.) So I guess my view's somewhere in between. (And this /is/ based on observations of the game history.) Of course, a "let's all work together to pay for these bugfixes" economy could also be interesting, but it makes it hard to make the economy competitive in other respects. -- ais523