I am fully excited. With all due respect to Richard, I share his need for reliable video playback, but physics and better (?) vector support is substantially appealing, and makes LiveCode a viable contender in games and simulation spaces, where currently it is not. A bigger market, and more users.
My bigger overall issue is display performance. Physics, improved video playback, and pretty much displaying everything on screen needs better performance. Am hoping the new changes bring about a new display architecture or whatever is needed to make LiveCode worthy of all these great new features. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, UX Design -------- Original message -------- Subject: Re: Physics Engine support From: Monte Goulding <mo...@sweattechnologies.com> To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> CC: Actually, I think where we are now just about to get past Box2D I think it would be good to get more detail on the vector object in some forum. Even if it's just an email here. People can clearly see Win8 as a benefit but the vector one is a bit to abstract to excite anyone but Scott Rossi. What are the core things you want us to know about this object, are there any other products that do similar things that you could point us to so we could see what we might get? On 28/02/2013, at 8:23 AM, Kevin Miller <ke...@runrev.com> wrote: > Yes. Couldn't agree more. -- Monte Goulding M E R Goulding - software development services mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
