Re: Any of you able to block this SPAM?

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Montag, 8. Mai 2006 10:34 Trevor wrote: > I've been receiving a number of these emails below. > Are any of you getting them and having any luck blocking them? Yes, your message made: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08=3.126, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001

SPF whitelisting from id for all sub domains

2006-05-09 Thread Ramprasad
Hi, I am using spamassassin with postfix on Linux. I am using def_whitelist_from_spf rules for whitlelisting popular newsletter mails Some domains send mails with from id as a subdomain of the main domain. for eg [EMAIL PROTECTED] How do I whitelist such ids ( the subdomain does not have a S

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Montag, 8. Mai 2006 21:52 Mike Jackson wrote: > DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE > but to have your #1 *ham* rule be one > that's supposed to identify *spam* doesn't speak well for the rule Isn't the intention of RFC_ABUSE to list any site that abuses RFC? So you can't really believe that it wants to identi

SoC student application deadline extended

2006-05-09 Thread Justin Mason
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2006/05/soc-student-application-deadline-has.html Monday, May 08, 2006 SoC Student Application Deadline Has Been Extended We've decided to extend the Summer of Code 2006 student application deadline to 11:00 PDT on Tuesday, May 9th. Thanks to all of you who'

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
jdow wrote: > From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > > > > > > > > > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES > > > > >%OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > > > > ---

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > don't bother to train it. Another reason for site-wide bayes, I'd say. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .

RE: spams regarding financing of residence and GeoCities

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: spams regarding financing of residence and GeoCities > I heard some people opine that GeoCities is doing a lot to combat > spam. > > I received a recent spam about "financing of residence" that sent me > to a Geocities page. > > Just how difficult would it be to block similar ki

My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
I probably get a FP about once a week as somebody will opt in a mailing list and a listed URL is in the mailing. When I get these complaints, I exempt the mailing list from the procmail rules so that the mailing list doesn't get scanned by SA. Just my 2 cents. | > This isn't to say that

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > > don't bother to train it. > > Another reason for site-wide bayes, I'd say. I've considered that, but it won't work in our setup. This box scans our internal email as

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| > Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that! | > {O.O} | | I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users | don't bother to train it. | I'm in a similar situation as Bowie. I had to turn of Bayes as mail that was obviously spam was getting a Bayes_0 pulling the # back do

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Randal, Phil
But. There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists. I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway. Cheers, Phil Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 10:27 > To: Bowie Bailey; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Latest sa-stats from last week > > | > Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that! > | > {O.O} > | > | I'm sure it can, but I

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| > I'm in a similar situation as Bowie. I had to turn of Bayes | > as mail that was obviously spam was getting a Bayes_0 pulling | > the # back down under the threshold. | > | | so why not just score BAYES_00, BAYES_20, etc all at at 0... and keep | BAYES_99, BAYES_95, etc scoring what they s

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| But. | | There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists. | | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. | | I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway. | | Cheers, | | Phil Easier said than done when you have a paying cust

[no subject]

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Does anyone know if the AuthCourier.pm module that is described on the page linked below works with SA 3.1.1? http://da.andaka.org/Doku/courier-spamassassin.html -- Bowie

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Jay Lee
wrote: | But. | | There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists. | | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. | | I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most of it anyway. | | Cheers, | | Phil Easier said than done when you hav

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > | But. > | > | There are some spammers who run "subscribe to" mailing lists. > | > | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. > | > | I call this stuff "subscription spam" and would block most > of it anyway. > | >

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: Latest sa-stats from last week > | > I'm in a similar situation as Bowie.  I had to turn of Bayes > | > as mail that was obviously spam was getting a Bayes_0 pulling > | > the # back down under the threshold. > | > > | > | so why not just score BAYES_00, BAYES_20, etc all at at

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| > | > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing. | > | Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are | getting hit? | | Jay I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I may have to tune URI_BLACK down

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:44 > To: Jay Lee > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > | > > | > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who > wants this specific

SPAM: Tangled web of fun....

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: SPAM: Tangled web of fun Alright, so I'm eating lunch and catching up on my sports car forum, where a buddy posts about a possible scam from selling something on craigslist. He gets an email (I don't have the headers.) supposedly from the USPS: I'm sniping a lot of useless info out

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Andy Jezierski
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/09/2006 10:27:27 AM: > | > Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that! > | > {O.O} > | > | I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > | don't bother to train it. > | > > I'm in a similar situation as Bowie.  I had to turn of Baye

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
wrote: > | > > | > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this > specific mailing. > | > > | Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are > | getting hit? > | > | Jay > > > I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is > so poor it is more > qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly > mass-check Theo posted) Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was designed to be :) Had it be

Nasty bug? in 3.1.1 headers inserting?

2006-05-09 Thread Sietse van Zanen
Hi,   I have come across a nasty issue after upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.1.1 last weekend.   Somehow the escape sequence when inserting headers into messages. Has changed from \n\t to \n\r\t See the two log examples below.   Apr 30 04:36:14 zpm sendmail[27183]: k3U2ZMeZ027183: Milter

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: >> >> Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who >> wants this specific mailing. > > Voluntary Human Shileds. They should find another provider, as the needs > of the many outweight the needs of the few. > Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who'

Re[2]: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Fred T
Hello Rick, Monday, May 8, 2006, 4:07:53 PM, you wrote: > Interesting, my Razor stats show a MUCH higher false positive rate, so > much so that I had to lower the scores dramatically. > Spam Ham > 1 RAZOR2_CHECK 9744

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: >> Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who's using >> URIBL_BLACK? > > Just his customer. :) > > I'm not that crazy! Are you sure? :) Oh, wait.. I forgot.. the first rule of the crazy sysadmins club is...

Re: Nasty bug? in 3.1.1 headers inserting?

2006-05-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:26:29PM +0200, Sietse van Zanen wrote: > Somehow the escape sequence when inserting headers into messages. Has > changed from \n\t to \n\r\t Sort of, "\r\n\t". > I wonder why the escape sequence suddenly includes a carriage return > (\r) together with the newline (\n)

Re: SPAM: Tangled web of fun....

2006-05-09 Thread Vivek Khera
On May 9, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Chris Santerre wrote: The Money OrderSM will NOT be dispatched or get to your resident until the shipment has been verified. This measure is taken in order to protect both seller and buyer interests and to reduce the occurrence of fraudulent activities. aka,

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: > >> >> I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is >> so poor it is more >> qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly >> mass-check Theo posted) > > Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was designed to be :) > > Had it been around .8xx I w

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:32 PM > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > > Chris Santerre wrote

AuthCourier.pm module for SA 3.1.1

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Does anyone know if the AuthCourier.pm module that is described on the page linked below works with SA 3.1.1? http://da.andaka.org/Doku/courier-spamassassin.html I seem to have forgotten to include a subject line on my first message. Sorry for the duplication. -- Bowie

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:12 PM > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > > Chris Santerre wrote

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured. The mailing was from Monster.com and the customer is livid :-( X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist * [URIs: uhm

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > -Original Message- > From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM > To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > > RE: My only

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:12 > To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got > capt

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
Chris and Dallas, Thank you for pointing this out. I will convey this back to the customer. - Original Message - From: "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:20 PM Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK | > -Original Message-

Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * 1.7 EXCUSE_6 BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: goldenpalace_MUNGE.com] * 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blo

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM >> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' >> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK >> >> >> RE: My only problem with URIB

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
Thanks! I need to investigate these further before writing them off as a FP. - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "''" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:51 PM Subject: Re: My only problem wi

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
ERRR... SA is rejecting this. this is getting better... notice the whois registration address "20222 shadowood parkway" matches those found here.. http://www.joewein.net/fraud/fraud-job-2006-04.htm (thanks joe) anyone looking for a job from these places is in for a suprise.. see, now you can

Re: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
wrote: > X-Spam-Report: > * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record > * 1.7 EXCUSE_6 BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list > * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist > * [URIs: goldenpalace_MUNGE.com] > * 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL li

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
resend again because SA is bouncing them.. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51 > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > Chris Santerre wrote: >

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 17:37 wrote: > Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this > specific mailing. He should just filter back those mails from the SPAM folder. You do send all SPAM to him anyway, just marked, don't you? So he has it. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monn

RE: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 15:01 > To: > Cc: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Here's another to look at > > wrote: > > X-Spam-Report: > > * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matche

Re: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| and we've had them listed for over 5 months without any delist requests | for it. can your customers whitelist their own garbage? | | dallas Dallas, You bring up a good point. I have a method where users can blacklist and block certain subjects. I just need to add a whitelising option and

limit child process

2006-05-09 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit the number of SA's child processes - The Perl has been killing swap space, I *believe* this would remedy my situation. Is this the appropriate list, or should I refer to FreeBSD list? tia Jean-Paul Natola Network Administrator Infor

Re: limit child process

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit the number of SA's child > processes - > > The Perl has been killing swap space, I *believe* this would remedy my > situation. > > Is this the appropriate list, or should I refer to FreeBSD list? This is the app

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > resend again because SA is bouncing them.. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51 >> To: Chris Santerre >> Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL

RE: limit child process

2006-05-09 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 4:23 PM To: Jean-Paul Natola Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: limit child process Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit the number of S

Re: limit child process

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| Spamd calls it, | | But I have seen my monitor , on more than one occasion, with this error, | | swap_pager_getswapspace: failed | | and the worst part is I don't realize it until I hit the KVM switch , and | actually get on the console - | | so can I customize spamd to a lower limit? |

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 15:29 > To: Dallas L. Engelken > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > resend again because SA is bouncing them..

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Dallas L. Engelken wrote: >> >> http://www.joewein.net/fraud/fraud-job-2006-04.htm >> >> > > i posted that, and reposted it due to list reject, about 30 min ago. > did it not come through? It depends upon how you define "came through"... Posted to the list - [OK] Delivered from list to my serv

RE: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 17:14 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I've considered that, but it won't work in our setup. This box > > scans our internal email as well as all of our customer's email. > > Since we are in an entirely different line of business from our > > customers, wh

False positives in mails from dynamic IP addresses

2006-05-09 Thread Jarek 111
Hello! I'm connecting to internet by ISP which gives me different IP every time, but I'm sending mails by relay on fixed ip. As I see, spamassassin is checking my dynamic IP address (RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL) and marks my emails as spam. Can I configure spamassassin, so it w

Strange Bayes results

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
I was checking the relative usefulness of the per-user Bayes databases for my users and came up with the following confusing information. When I look at the overall stats, bayes does pretty good: RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ---

Re: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread Kelson
Matt Kettler wrote: They also engage other "creative" marketing tactics. They sponsored the guy who streaked at the superbowl in 2004, who painted their URL on his chest before running naked onto the field: Didn't they also sponsor one of the X-Prize contestants? I seem to recall that they ga

RE: Strange Bayes results

2006-05-09 Thread Bowie Bailey
Bowie Bailey wrote: > I was checking the relative usefulness of the per-user Bayes databases > for my users and came up with the following confusing information. > > When I look at the overall stats, bayes does pretty good: > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > ---

Re: False positives in mails from dynamic IP addresses

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Jarek 111 wrote: > Hello! > > I'm connecting to internet by ISP which gives me different IP every > time, but I'm sending mails by relay on fixed ip. As I see, spamassassin > is checking my dynamic IP address (RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL) and > marks my emails as spam. > Can I conf

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:01 Bowie Bailey wrote: > Hmm... If you are training Bayes, and all of your ham is in English, > then what does Bayes do with the Chinese ham your customers get? Nothing. But you won't get a SPAM report from bayes if the e-mail is chinese and you never feed chinese lang

Remove Me

2006-05-09 Thread Aaron Boyles
How do I take myself off this mailing list? -Javin

Re: Remove Me

2006-05-09 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
Aaron Boyles wrote: > How do I take myself off this mailing list? > > -Javin list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Quality Business Hosting & Colocation http:/

Re: Remove Me

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Aaron Boyles wrote: > How do I take myself off this mailing list? > > -Javin > Check the headers of any message on this list. They all have a "list-unsubscribe" header. This is the RFC 2369 standardized way for mailing lists to provide this information, so be sure to look for it elsewhere too.

Re: Strange Bayes results

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:14 Bowie Bailey wrote: > When I look at the overall stats, bayes does pretty good: > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > >6BAYES_9926754 4.19 44.49 67.003.06 3%

Re: Strange Bayes results

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 23:32 Bowie Bailey wrote: > And as an additional data point, I found this for one of our internal > users who has never done any manual training: > RANK    RULE NAME     COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM > >

Re: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread John Rudd
On May 9, 2006, at 12:47 PM, wrote: X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * 1.7 EXCUSE_6 BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: goldenpalace_MUNGE.com] * 1.5 URIBL_WS_SUR

OT: "formail -D" replacement

2006-05-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
Sorry to go off-topic here, but I'm in the process of trying to figure out a better way of detecting duplicates in my corpus, which right now uses a combination of "formail -D" (ie: message-id header) and a sha1sum of the message. Unduplicating the current messages is pretty simple (find duplicate

SQL prefs, what config allowed?

2006-05-09 Thread Charles Sprickman
Hi all, Is there a canonical listing somewhere of which user prefs are allowed when using the SQL store for user preferences? Can I just assume everything here: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html Is possible via the SQL prefs? Thanks, Charles

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread List Mail User
>... >> What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP? >> > >seriously? the domains is 3 days old and is unreachable, and uses >outfitter.net NS's which appear to have an identity crisis. > >April 25th, >ns1.outfiter.net 206.173.156.105 >ns2.outfiter.net 24.98.13.40 >

Re: Nasty bug? in 3.1.1 headers inserting?

2006-05-09 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 5/9/2006 2:16 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: There's some difference of opinion around this question, but my general opinion is that there should be an update to spamass-milter which properly handles the newlines either way. I'm not sure whether or not that's happened yet. As discussed in this

bayes database problem with 3.1.1

2006-05-09 Thread Webmaster
Running on freebsd 6.0 Having problems getting 3.1.1 to work with mysql based bayes. Please see the sa-learn -D --sync result mail-av1# sa-learn -D --sync [25988] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all [25988] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG [25988] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.1.1 [25988]

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:36 PM > To: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK > > >... > >> What are your though

Re: Here's another to look at

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * 1.7 EXCUSE_6 BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist * [URIs: goldenpalace_MUNGE.com] * 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Monnerie wrote: On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > don't bother to train it. Another reason for site-wide bayes, I'd say. I've considered that, but it won't work in our setup. T

Re: Latest sa-stats from last week

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jdow wrote: From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > > > > > > > RANKRULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES > > > >%OFMAIL %OFSPA

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured. The mailing was from Monster.com and the customer is livid :-( X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK RE: My only p

Re: 20_bodytests

2006-05-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Dan-80 wrote: > > 2) What do 'tflags' do?: > > describe MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY MIME character set indicates foreign > language > tflags MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY userconf > tflags SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME [ {net|nice|learn|userconf|noautolearn} ] Used to set flags on a test. These fla

RE: SPAM: Tangled web of fun....

2006-05-09 Thread Brent Kennedy
Title: SPAM: Tangled web of fun LOL, thats pretty sad.  Stupid cons have ruined the internet flea market.  From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:07 PMTo: Spaml (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)Subject: SPAM: Tangled web of fun Alright, so

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
Is bouncing messages from the list to the original senders with protocol error complaints. It might be nice to unsubscribe him until he gets it fixed. {^_^}