From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: qqqq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got
captured. The mailing was from
Monster.com and the customer is livid :-(
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
* 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
* [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
* 3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
blocklist
* [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
I had to _MUNGED the domain because the mailing hit 13.5 and bounced
The threshold is 5.5
Here is from my original stats post:
1 URIBL_BLACK 163397 7.09 29.11
78.05 0.50
5 URIBL_JP_SURBL 118251 5.13 21.07
56.48 0.09
What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP?
Its not an FP.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.writing.screenplays.moderated/browse_frm
/thread/e7fca5612bbf5aa3/fc75be5ae3052cbb?lnk=st&q=uhmcargo.net&rnum=1&hl=en
#fc75be5ae3052cbb
And the registrant is a single person with, it appears, one single
network address. For the 6th largest shipper that is a pathetic
web presence.
{^_-}
