From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> qqqq wrote:
> > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES
> > > > %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 1 URIBL_BLACK 163397 7.09
> > > > 29.11 78.05 0.50
> > >
> > > Nice.
> > >
> > > How does that Queen song go?? We... are... ;)
> >
> > LOL! Congrats!
>
> I'll second that! I think the network tests are taking over...
>
> TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 6 BAYES_99 26754 4.19 44.49 67.00 3.06
Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that!
{O.O}
I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users
don't bother to train it.
That brings to mind an interesting question. Could SpamAssassin (ever)
be configured to accept a global Bayes with per user Bayes for er
"seasoning"? Could such a setup be effective?
{^_^}
