Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 16:18 Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users > > don't bother to train it. > > Another reason for site-wide bayes, I'd say.
I've considered that, but it won't work in our setup. This box scans our internal email as well as all of our customer's email. Since we are in an entirely different line of business from our customers, what we consider to be ham and spam will be quite different from theirs. If I could train it on both sets, it might work, but I don't have access to any of their emails for training. Also, I really prefer a per-user bayes for our internal email since there are various accounts that get a specific type of ham and work very well with Bayes. -- Bowie
