> -----Original Message-----
> From: qqqq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler'
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK
>
>
> RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got
> captured. The mailing was from
> Monster.com and the customer is livid :-(
>
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
> * 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> * [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
> * 3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
> * [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
> * 3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
> blocklist
> * [URIs: uhmcargo_MUNGED.net]
>
> I had to _MUNGED the domain because the mailing hit 13.5 and bounced
>
> The threshold is 5.5
>
>
> Here is from my original stats post:
> 1 URIBL_BLACK 163397 7.09 29.11
> 78.05 0.50
> 5 URIBL_JP_SURBL 118251 5.13 21.07
> 56.48 0.09
>
> What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP?
Its not an FP.
--Chris
