| > I'm in a similar situation as Bowie. I had to turn of Bayes | > as mail that was obviously spam was getting a Bayes_0 pulling | > the # back down under the threshold. | > | | so why not just score BAYES_00, BAYES_20, etc all at at 0... and keep | BAYES_99, BAYES_95, etc scoring what they score. if you trust its spam | accuracy but not its ham accuracy, that would be the logical way to go i | would say?
Hmm...good point. I think I'll try that. <Smack on head> QQQQ
