jdow wrote:
> From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > qqqq wrote:
> > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > RANK    RULE NAME                       COUNT %OFRULES
> > > > >    %OFMAIL %OFSPAM  %OFHAM
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > 1 URIBL_BLACK                     163397    7.09 
> > > > > 29.11   78.05    0.50
> > > > 
> > > > Nice.
> > > > 
> > > > How does that Queen song go??  We... are...  ;)
> > > 
> > > LOL!  Congrats!
> > 
> > I'll second that!  I think the network tests are taking over...
> > 
> > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > RANK    RULE NAME    COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >  6      BAYES_99     26754     4.19   44.49   67.00  3.06
> 
> Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that!
> {O.O}

I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users
don't bother to train it.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to