jdow wrote: > From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > qqqq wrote: > > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES > > > > > %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > 1 URIBL_BLACK 163397 7.09 > > > > > 29.11 78.05 0.50 > > > > > > > > Nice. > > > > > > > > How does that Queen song go?? We... are... ;) > > > > > > LOL! Congrats! > > > > I'll second that! I think the network tests are taking over... > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > 6 BAYES_99 26754 4.19 44.49 67.00 3.06 > > Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that! > {O.O}
I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users don't bother to train it. -- Bowie