Chris Santerre wrote: > >> >> I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is >> so poor it is more >> qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly >> mass-check Theo posted) > > Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was designed to be :) > > Had it been around .8xx I would have been worried. I don't expect that > to ever be over .55 at most. >
Then why is the suggested score on uribl.com 0.25 for this list? http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml If you're expecting the S/O to be that low it should be very near or below 0. (I'm going to revise my own config to 0.001 for this one)
