[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I added a dummy mx record (lowest preference) as we all know its
generally the one th spammers target first, which is getting hit with
about 50% of our daily connections, of which i defer all of them at a
very low overhead.
May I ask what kind of software/setti
Just a quick note that the SARE specific.cf and obfu.cf rules files
have been updated.
Documentation at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#specific and
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#obfu
Updates to specific.cf are minor.
Updates to obfu.cf include 36 new rules, including several for
Hi everyone,
I'm running SA 3.02 for a few weeks now together with amavisd-new-20030616 and
it seems that MISSING_SUBJECT is firing on every mail even if there is a
Subject: header and it's not empty. Has anyone experienced this problem or have
an idea whats going on? I've googled around some,
On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 6:54:57 AM, wrote:
> Guys,
> I just can't seem to lick this problem. Any ideas?
How about a rule to score "My Pool Leaks, Inc." in message texts?
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
At 09:56 AM 5/26/2005, Shawn R. Beairsto wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm running SA 3.02 for a few weeks now together with amavisd-new-20030616
and it seems that MISSING_SUBJECT is firing on every mail even if there is
a Subject: header and it's not empty. Has anyone experienced this problem
or have
Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules catch
pretty much everything anyway?
--
Jake Colman
Sr. Applications Developer
Principia Partners LLC
Harborside Financial Center
1001 Plaza Two
Jersey Cit
Yes, BAYES is an integral part of SA!
It's like a constantly changing rule (without the need to tweak the rule
ever so slightly for nuances in the "new" mail.
There are mails that don't trip any standard rules, but are caught by
bayes alone.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Jake Colman [
We have found Bayes to be more trouble than it's worth. We were
frequently running into problems keeping the database stable and fresh.
We have a site-wide install so that just made it all the more
problematic.
It definitely depends on your situation. I don't think anyone can make
a blanket stat
>-Original Message-
>From: aecioneto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:36 PM
>To: users
>Subject: Re: Comparison of SA and commercial solutions
>
>
>Loren and Chris,
>thanks for your replies.
>I am aware of SA, I have been using it from a very long time
>ago - ha
On Thursday May 26 2005 10:30 am, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: aecioneto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:36 PM
> >To: users
> >Subject: Re: Comparison of SA and commercial solutions
> >
> >
> >Loren and Chris,
> >thanks for your replies.
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:08 -0400, Jake Colman wrote:
> Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules catch
> pretty much everything anyway?
I have used SA with Bayes and it took quite a bit of adminis
* Kristopher Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We have found Bayes to be more trouble than it's worth. We were
> frequently running into problems keeping the database stable and fresh.
> We have a site-wide install so that just made it all the more
> problematic.
We also have a site-wide install with
I think points can be made for both sides of the argument. The thing that makes bayes different, is that a well trained bayes database is specific to your environment. If you're a law firm, your learned ham is going to be heavy in legalese, medical related org, heavy in that terminology. Becaus
Can anyone explain to me as to why this message was marked as ham.
Thank you
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 4praise.com ([220.160.189.10])
by mail2.qmlhost.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j4Q5SHOl030285
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 01:28:27 -0400
Mes
Jake Colman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/25/2005
10:12:08 PM:
[snip]
> How can I limit the number of sendmails anyway?
My server gets very
> overloaded in those circumstances. In general, what happens
if there are
> more sendmails than there are spamd processes?
>
You can try confCONNECTI
>-Original Message-
>From: Jake Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:09 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Is Bayes Really Necessary?
>
>
>
>Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
>expanded with SARE, does bayes lea
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Joe Zitnik wrote:
> I think points can be made for both sides of the argument. The thing
> that makes bayes different, is that a well trained bayes database is
> specific to your environment. If you're a law firm, your learned ham is
> going to be heavy in legalese, medical
Can someone get the file specific information straight for those of us who download manually? Example: specific shows Last update 2005-5-26, but if you open the file, its modified date is # Modified: 2005-03-26, header is the same way, last update is 2005-05-21, but modified day in the file is #
I have autolearn off. I have been burned by it twice.>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/26/2005 10:33 AM >>>
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Joe Zitnik wrote:> I think points can be made for both sides of the argument. The thing> that makes bayes different, is that a well trained bayes database is> specific to your
Joe Zitnik wrote:
Bayes definitely helps, but auto-learn can cause problems. Perhaps a
better question would be, "Is autolearn really neccessary?"
I think the problems mostly come from accidentally autolearning spam as
ham, which is easy with the default threshold. Autolearning messages as
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Kristopher Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We have found Bayes to be more trouble than it's worth. We were
frequently running into problems keeping the database stable and fresh.
We have a site-wide install so that just made it all the more
problematic.
We also have a
Tim Macrina wrote:
> Can anyone explain to me as to why this message was marked as ham.
> Thank you
Because it didn't hit any rules. No hits = ham, and by default, autolearn as ham
(IMO this is a bad thing, but the default SA ruleset doesn't have enough
negative-scoring rules to use a negative lea
Aecio F. Neto wrote:
Is there any *good* and *trustable* comparison between SA and other
commercial solutions?
I looked into a few dedicated commercial spam appliances, but most
(but not all) of which used a customised version of SpamAssassin as
part of their detection process anyway. Messa
* Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have been running sitewide bayes since the beginning without much
> maintenance at all. It has autolearned every message itself and its
> dead on balls accurate. I've trained maybe 20 message total manually so
> i dont see how running bayes could actually c
One way to keep Bayes from running is to never train it.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Kristopher Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We have found Bayes to be more trouble than it's worth. We were
frequently running into problems keeping the database stable and fresh.
We have a site-wide i
I'm pretty new to SA but my local.cf has the following entries
skip_rbl_checks 0
use_razor2 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
I believe this means that I am not using any of the checks. Are these features
that need to be installed? Are there others I should
use in additi
Tim Macrina wrote:
> I'm pretty new to SA but my local.cf has the following entries
>
> skip_rbl_checks 0
> use_razor20
> use_dcc 0
> use_pyzor 0
>
> I believe this means that I am not using any of the checks. Are these
> features that need to be insta
jdow wrote:
> One way to keep Bayes from running is to never train it.
> {^_^}
You'd also disable autolearning. By default SA will eventually autolearn enough
email to being using bayes. (and often these pure auto-learn only DBs end up
with very bad results.)
Because you don't have any rules enabled that hit it.
I suggest turning on URIBL tests. I have them scored highly and a low
threshold to flag spam as that is ok with my setup. I don't know whether the
how high the default scores would take this.
Three lists got:
http://p.w8k.jumptothehighestpoint.
Matt Kettler wrote:
jdow wrote:
One way to keep Bayes from running is to never train it.
{^_^}
You'd also disable autolearning. By default SA will eventually autolearn enough
email to being using bayes. (and often these pure auto-learn only DBs end up
with very bad results.)
Often is the
aecioneto wrote:
I post such inquiry to the list because some prospects of mine very often tend to compare
feature-by-feature (nonse, IMHO) and - thanks to MS culture - have doubts about a
solution with no helpdesk phone at the "other side of the box".
Forgive this little rant, but support
I have this message that continually gets by Spam Assassin. The headers
have no indication that SA has even touched it. I will post the headers
below, as well as the message.
I get various messages all of which have the basic same body content. If I
forward this message to myself, it clearly t
I have to admit… Some people are actually trying to
help me keep bad material out of our school district. They are attaching a “sexually-explicit:
text text text” in the subject line. So I thought that I’d write a
rule to catch that and re-route the mail to the blackhole. Any ideas on wh
And when in doubt go to Linux world. Last year everyone was pushing the
antispam solution which was just a fancy SA implementation on their
hardware, overpriced and pushed back with the exact same support that you
are getting here. I think it's because even their support people are in
this room (
I can only speak from the perspective of a small (but growing, thank you)
shop. I was committed to using Linux and FOSS from the get, anyway, but as
a start-up, commercial solutions to a great many of our needs were out of
reach, price-wise. Our email solution was
sendmail-spamassassin-rdj-c
Tim Jackson wrote:
No, it's *not* normal in the slightest. Why on earth are they the
registrant of the domain? They are making trouble for themselves
(and their customers) if they are making themselves the Registrant
of customer domains. (As you can see in this case). Technical contact,
sure. Bil
On 5/26/2005 10:08 AM, Jake Colman wrote:
> Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules catch
> pretty much everything anyway?
The base SA install is insufficient, but if you tweak the scores and ad
On 5/26/2005 10:30 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Understood, and very good effort by you to educate them. Mostly all the
> reviews slam the cost benefit of SA with the "Pay an employee to
> support it." line of crap.
Every filtering system requires admin time, and if the reviews don't say
as much
Though nobody seems to have said it exactly this way: It seems
to be becoming very obvious that the people who say the have problems
with Bayes are those who support a diverse group of users (e.g. ISPs
and email providers) and those who find it works well, even with autolearning
are those
Johnson, S wrote:
I have to admit… Some people are actually trying to help me keep bad
material out of our school district. They are attaching a
“sexually-explicit: text text text” in the subject line. So I thought
that I’d write a rule to catch that and re-route the mail to the
blackhole. An
Johnson, S wrote:
> I have to admit… Some people are actually trying to help me keep bad
> material out of our school district. They are attaching a
> “sexually-explicit: text text text” in the subject line. So I thought
> that I’d write a rule to catch that and re-route the mail to the
> blackho
> Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules
catch
> pretty much everything anyway?
Um, maybe, maybe not.
Bayes *necessary*? No, especially if you run net tests.
Bayes *highly desirable*? Yup. A
> I have this message that continually gets by Spam Assassin. The headers
> have no indication that SA has even touched it. I will post the headers
> below, as well as the message.
Which version of SA? How are you feeding it? Procmail? Something else?
I don't see anything obvious at a real q
> Any ideas on why this isn't working? Thanks!
header ZXS_SEXUALLY_EXPLICIT Subject =~ /\bsexually-explicit/i
describe ZXS_SEXUALLY_EXPLICIT bad...bad...bad...
score ZXS_SEXUALLY_EXPLICIT 10
Looks good to me. Did you remember to restart spamd after you put this in a
rules file somewhere?
Actu
No, it's not... I wonder why this is? I'm on SA 3.0.1 as well.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Peuhkurinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:06 PM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ideas on why this rule isn't working?
Johnson, S wrote:
> I have to a
> No, it's not... I wonder why this is? I'm on SA 3.0.1 as well.
That rule may not have been in 3.0.1, if I recall correctly. It started as
a SARE rule and moved over at some point. Maybe that was 0.1, maybe 0.2.
Not very long ago though.
Loren
On Thursday May 26 2005 1:13 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> > expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules
>
> catch
>
> > pretty much everything anyway?
>
> Um, maybe, maybe not.
>
> Bayes *necessary*?
Hi,
I'd like to change/reset-to-zero the autowhite list value for a sender.
I read the man page (Mail::Spamassassin::Autowhitelist) but don't
comprehend the syntax.
Can someone give me a hint?
Thanks,
Craig Jackson
I have an 80_customsex.cf file that I created. I did run --lint and
restart spamd. The other rules I have in that file have hit on spam
messages.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Johnson, S
Cc: users@spamassassin.ap
Where can I get the SARE rule for this?
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:33 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ideas on why this rule isn't working?
> Any ideas on why this isn't working? Thanks!
header ZXS_S
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:30:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
[...]
> >My intention was to have some external opinion - magazine,
> >site review, you name it - saying that when summing up
> >cost/benefit of SA comparing to other things out there, it is
> >best by far (this is my opinion).
>
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:55 -0500, Craig Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to change/reset-to-zero the autowhite list value for a sender.
> I read the man page (Mail::Spamassassin::Autowhitelist) but don't
> comprehend the syntax.
>
> Can someone give me a hint?
Rather than Mail::Spamassassin::Au
> "CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jake Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:09 AM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Is Bayes Really Necessary?
>>
>>
>>
>> Given
I confess, I've been using RDJ for at least a year now without really
having any idea what i'm doing. It downloads the new rules as it should,
and spamassassin uses them, but I have some SARE rules that require the
"Personal Rule" snippet to be added to the rules_du_jour script.
When a new ru
guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:55 -0500, Craig Jackson wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>I'd like to change/reset-to-zero the autowhite list value for a sender.
>>I read the man page (Mail::Spamassassin::Autowhitelist) but don't
>>comprehend the syntax.
>>
>>Can someone give me a hint?
>
>
> Rather
>-Original Message-
>From: Jake Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:54 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Is Bayes Really Necessary?
>
>
>> "CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From:
>-Original Message-
>From: guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:52 PM
>To: Craig Jackson
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Adjusting the AWL value
>
>
>On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:55 -0500, Craig Jackson wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to change/reset-t
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jake Colman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Bayes Really Necessary?
"CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> F
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 2:52 PM
To: Craig Jackson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adjusting the AWL value
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 12:55 -0500, Craig Jackson wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to chang
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:42 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> For site wide, I'm pretty much against it. I know people will argue that
> point. I'm obviously biased towards SARE rules updated with RDJ. And the use
> of URIBL.com lists. But these allow a general users, or a sitewide install
> to "set
Jim Maul wrote:
>
> Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
>
> Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
>
>
No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
--remove-head-from-ass. However, this will fail on some systems
On Thursday May 26 2005 3:54 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
> >
> > Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
>
> No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
> --remove-
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Isn't the landscape bar required in every sysadmin's tool kit?
A 3.5 foot length of "sucker rod" is also acceptable. (See the Linux
syslogd(8) manpage, 'SECURITY THREATS' section, for details:
http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man8/syslogd.8.html)
Cricket bats are, I'
>-Original Message-
>From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:05 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Adjusting the AWL value
>
>
>Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
>> Isn't the landscape bar required in every sysadmin's tool kit?
>
>A 3.5 foot le
On Thursday May 26 2005 4:19 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:05 PM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: Adjusting the AWL value
> >
> >Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> >> Isn't the la
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
--remove-head-from-ass. However, this will fail on
Hey all,
I was migrating over to SQL, and I've written a script that allows users
to migrate their prefs into (and out of) a SQL database, including some
command line switches for root to be able to migrate all users in at once.
My code's not the cleanest in the world, but I'm trying.
I wrot
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
Hi,
I have just started reporting spam and I wonder if SpamCop really
expects it's users to confirm every submission in the web interface?
Yes, they do. This is to ensure a minimum of false positives. By
default, I only report things that do NO
Jason Marshall wrote:
When a new rules_du_jour is released, it downloads it, and i have to
manually add the "Personal Rule" snippets to the script again.
Is there a way to put those in the /etc/rulesdujour/config file so
that they don't need to be re-added all the time?
Yes! You should
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:08 -0400, Jake Colman wrote:
> > Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> > expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules catch
> > pretty much everything anyway?
>
> I hav
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
>
>
> Matt,
>
> Isn't the landscape bar required in every sysadmin's tool kit?
>
> Dimitri
>
Every sysadmin requires some form of LART in his toolkit. Not all sysadmins
require a head extraction tool, although they are quite handy.
Many tools, such as the landscape b
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in the same
way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need to be
contained in some kind of $variable="" declaration?
Nope, it looks
Matt Kettler wrote:
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
Matt,
Isn't the landscape bar required in every sysadmin's tool kit?
Dimitri
Every sysadmin requires some form of LART in his toolkit. Not all sysadmins
require a head extraction tool, although they are quite handy.
Many tools, such as the la
Jason Marshall wrote:
Yes! You should be able to add these directly to the config file in
the same way you are (I believe) currently adding them to the
built-in registry.
Thanks, Chris, do they just get added to the bottom, or do they need
to be contained in some kind of $variable="" decla
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
--remove-head-from-ass. However, this will fail on som
Hi,
I'm new to SpamAssassin, and I've been running some tests.
I've been using the get_report() method to get a report of the rules that were
triggered by a message.
Is there a method that can identify where in the content the rule was
triggered (e.g. a line number, or a regular expression wit
Martyn Drake wrote:
Aecio F. Neto wrote:
Is there any *good* and *trustable* comparison between SA and other
commercial solutions?
I looked into a few dedicated commercial spam appliances, but most (but
not all) of which used a customised version of SpamAssassin as part of
their detection
Title: Fwd: Re: Adjusting the AWL
value
Since we are getting off the subject of Adjusting the AWL value.
Maybe I could use one or more of these to extricate certain parts of
ones body from another part of the body:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/gbu-28e.htm
Seriously en
> "CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I already use RDJ and the automatic updater. How do I use URIBL? I
>> looked at the usage page and I undersyand that I need to create a .cf
>> file but how does it access the lists?
CS> If you are using SA 3.x, support is a
Thanks Matt and Theo for your helpful replies.
I have now disabled the auto expiry, so it won't happen during the scanning
of a message. I can then trigger it to do this at a time during the night
when it doesn't matter so much.
I have also sorted out my trusted path, and now where ever the emails
Jake Colman wrote:
>>"CS" == Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>CS> If you are using SA 3.x, support is already included. You simply have
>CS> to create the config file, restart spamd, and *poof* way less spam.
>
>CS> Net::Dns is required. I forget which version. I forg
Ben Wylie wrote:
>
> Now that I have got my trusted networks sorted out, may I ask this question
> again?
>
> =
> Secondly it appears that even when it has all the information to do the spf
> check, it can't find the module. I thought i had installe
Hello Chris,
Thursday, May 26, 2005, 1:19:19 PM, you wrote:
>>Cricket bats are, I'm told, another favorite in some parts of
>>the world for dealing with recalcitrant users.
CS> All second fiddle to being a 6 foot, 230 lb ex-boxer, martial
CS> artist, and avid ice hockey player.
You cheat.
CS>
Hello List,
Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:05:26 AM, you wrote:
LMU>Though nobody seems to have said it exactly this way: It seems
LMU> to be becoming very obvious that the people who say the have problems
LMU> with Bayes are those who support a diverse group of users (e.g. ISPs
LMU> and email p
Hello Joe,
Thursday, May 26, 2005, 7:37:55 AM, you wrote:
JZ> Can someone get the file specific information straight for
JZ> those of us who download manually? ...
Sure, someone could. Apparently not me. :-)
Anyone got a good secretary available?
Bob Menschel
Hello Alan,
Thursday, May 26, 2005, 9:20:51 AM, you wrote:
AF> I have this message that continually gets by Spam Assassin. The headers
AF> have no indication that SA has even touched it. I will post the headers
AF> below, as well as the message.
Unfortunately, you posted the text, and you pos
Hello Jeff,
Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 10:42:57 PM, you wrote:
JC> On Wednesday, May 25, 2005, 9:19:43 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
>> Just a quick note that the SARE whitelist rules file has been updated.
>> Documentation at http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#whitelist
>> Bob Menschel
JC> A cou
Hello ,
Thursday, May 26, 2005, 6:54:57 AM, you wrote:
q> Guys,
q> I just can't seem to lick this problem. Any ideas?
One idea: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DoYouWantMySpam
The way many of us would help would be to take your email, the full
email, the unadulterated uncut unmodifie
If I run spamassassin --lint I get the following messages. Can anyone tell me
what they mean and how to fix them? Thank you
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skiping: detailed_phrase_score 1
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skiping: spam_level_stars 1
config: SpamAssassin faile
Tim Macrina wrote:
> If I run spamassassin --lint I get the following messages. Can anyone tell me
> what they mean and how to fix them? Thank you
>
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skiping: detailed_phrase_score 1
> config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skiping: spam_level_stars
THis may be a dumb question but were can I find those lines? I looked
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and I can't locate those entires.
On 5/26/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Macrina wrote:
> > If I run spamassassin --lint I get the following messages. Can anyone tell
> > me
Tim Macrina wrote:
> THis may be a dumb question but were can I find those lines? I looked
> in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and I can't locate those entires.
Try ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Hi Matt,
looked in every user_prefs file on my system and I could find any
reference to those lines.
On 5/26/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Macrina wrote:
> > THis may be a dumb question but were can I find those lines? I looked
> > in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and I can'
> looked in every user_prefs file on my system and I could find any
> reference to those lines.
If you're running 'spamassassin --lint' as root, I guess you should look
in /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs as well.
The user_prefs ONLY are evaluated of the user running spamassassin. No
need to look
From: "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If that's not bad enough, I find most support from proprietary software
> vendors to be the pits. We have Mcafee's Enterprise Anti-Virus suite
> with a support contract. However, I hate calling them because I tend
> to have to wait 30+ minutes
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Tim Macrina wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> looked in every user_prefs file on my system and I could find any
> reference to those lines.
>
> On 5/26/05, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tim Macrina wrote:
> > > THis may be a dumb question but were can I find those lines? I loo
On Thu, 26 May 2005, jdow wrote:
> From: "Kevin Peuhkurinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip..]
> > putting me on hold for another 30+ minutes while they try to track down
> > a second level support person.
>
> That's 30 minutes
>
> > On the other hand, I had a question about SpamAssassin the other
At 05:56 PM 5/26/2005, David wrote:
I'm new to SpamAssassin, and I've been running some tests.
I've been using the get_report() method to get a report of the rules that
were
triggered by a message.
Is there a method that can identify where in the content the rule was
triggered (e.g. a line nu
>...
>
>Hello List,
>
>Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:05:26 AM, you wrote:
>
>LMU> Though nobody seems to have said it exactly this way: It seems
>LMU> to be becoming very obvious that the people who say the have problems
>LMU> with Bayes are those who support a diverse group of users (e.g. ISPs
>LM
I have a custom black list with rules like :
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can one make sure these rules are picked up by spamassassin as these
emails are still getting through
Spamassassin running on Freebsd.
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
