Because you don't have any rules enabled that hit it.
I suggest turning on URIBL tests. I have them scored highly and a low
threshold to flag spam as that is ok with my setup. I don't know whether the
how high the default scores would take this.
Three lists got:
http://p.w8k.jumptothehighestpoint.com/ySqe/
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server
X-Spam-Spammy: 0.999-4--0h-51s--0d--decrease, 0.997-2--0h-15s--2d--gget
X-Spam-Hammy: 0.006-5--9h-0s--9d--H*r:8.13.4,
0.025-1856--4686h-300s--0d--Sent
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received:
date
* 0.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
* [score: 0.5297]
* 2.7 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
* [URIs: jumptothehighestpoint.com]
* 4.0 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL
blocklist
* [URIs: jumptothehighestpoint.com]
* 4.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL
blocklist
* [URIs: jumptothehighestpoint.com]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.9 required=2.4 bayes=0.5297 tests=BAYES_50,
DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: ***********
Ben
