On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:42 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > For site wide, I'm pretty much against it. I know people will argue that > point. I'm obviously biased towards SARE rules updated with RDJ. And the use > of URIBL.com lists. But these allow a general users, or a sitewide install > to "set and forget". Which is what we strive for, so SA can be more widley > excepted. > > I have a 99% filter rate without bayes. And I'm proud of that.
I've been testing URIBL and SURBL against just reversing the hostnames and looking it up on SBL-XBL, and I can say that URIBL and SURBL don't catch nearly the number of spams. I get close to a 99% filter rate just checking the links alone.
