On Thursday May 26 2005 1:13 pm, Loren Wilton wrote: > > Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can > > expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules > > catch > > > pretty much everything anyway? > > Um, maybe, maybe not. > > Bayes *necessary*? No, especially if you run net tests. > Bayes *highly desirable*? Yup. An additional 4 points can really help > when a new spam shows up that you don't have a lot of rules for. > > Loren
Loren's point well taken. I think it's the use of bayes in conjunction with other rules that tends to work best. At least, that's my experience. Dimitri
