On 08/01/2012 10:37 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:08:35 -0400, eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I'm ALMOST sure my acct is root
Could you show the terminal output of the "id" command?
Unfortunately it's too latethe laptop has since "given up the
ghost"...I'm in
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:08:35 -0400, eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
> Well I'm ALMOST sure my acct is root
Could you show the terminal output of the "id" command?
--
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.10 0.19 0.22
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
Cool!Iwill!...you have so much knowledge about this stuff...and you
claim to do this for fun!!???
On Aug 1, 2012 7:15 AM, "Ed Greshko" wrote:
> "eoconno...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> >Well I'm ALMOST sure my acct is rootI don't remember creating a
> >different username/acct when I first insta
"eoconno...@gmail.com" wrote:
>Well I'm ALMOST sure my acct is rootI don't remember creating a
>different username/acct when I first installed Fedora. And when I
>install software and I get prompted for a passwordthe same one that
>logs me in also gets me past authentication.bit there
quot;Ed Greshko"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Unable To Update.
Date: Wed, Aug 1, 2012 6:03 am
On 08/01/2012 05:06 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> I tried Ed, but it's saying I don't have permissions..now I know this is
> i
On 08/01/2012 05:06 PM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> I tried Ed, but it's saying I don't have permissions..now I know this is
> ill advised, but when I first installed F16 I did the unthinkable and made my
> USER account the ROOT account, so I don't see how that's
> possible.hmmm..
On 07/31/2012 07:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/01/2012 06:33 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
WellI tried the suggestion Ed, and unfortunately this is the output:
bash-4.2# yum distro-sync
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves
http://repos.fedorapeople.
On 08/01/2012 06:33 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> WellI tried the suggestion Ed, and unfortunately this is the output:
>
> bash-4.2# yum distro-sync
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/luya/gimp/fedora-15/i686/re
On 07/31/2012 09:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/31/2012 09:02 PM, Eddie O'Connor wrote:
And in reference to upgrading from F16 to F17I'm not realy going to do THAT until I know they've worked
out all the kinks, I always kind of "trail" the releases so that I'm never so far ahead that I
ca
On 07/31/2012 09:02 PM, Eddie O'Connor wrote:
> And in reference to upgrading from F16 to F17I'm not realy going to do
> THAT until I know they've worked out all the kinks, I always kind of "trail"
> the releases so that I'm never so far ahead that I can't go "back". I only
> recently moved
And in reference to upgrading from F16 to F17I'm not realy going to do
THAT until I know they've worked out all the kinks, I always kind of
"trail" the releases so that I'm never so far ahead that I can't go "back".
I only recently moved up from F15 when it's Support Life Cycle endedI;l
be
Thanks Ed!I'll try that and let you know how it goes...
Sent from Eddie's Cell Phone
- Reply message -
From: "Ed Greshko"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Unable To Update.
Date: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 8:56 pm
On 07/31/2012 08:46 A
On 07/31/2012 08:46 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> I'm currently finding it difficult to upgrade my Fedora 16 laptop. I have
> tried being selective and choosing just one or two of the updates in the he
> updates list, hoping that after they went through I'd be able to do the rest
> but to n
I'm currently finding it difficult to upgrade my Fedora 16 laptop. I
have tried being selective and choosing just one or two of the updates
in the he updates list, hoping that after they went through I'd be able
to do the rest but to no avail. I would like to submit a photo of the
actual update
My problem is gone.
*I can update/upgrade packages onto my Fedora 16(x86_64) OS at ease.*
I thank all my Friends for their valuable suggestions and advice regarding
configuring(choosing) correctly the repositories from the repos list,and to
erase or deselect certain packages which were providing d
On 1/28/2012 5:53 PM, Kaushik Guha wrote:
To Mr. Paul Allen Newell: Sir,it was a legit request .But I do honour
and respect people's privacy.Sir,I am removing your name from my
Google+ circle as you suggested on the mail.Also,remember I do not
have any malicious intentions as such.
From
-Kaus
To Mr. Paul Allen Newell: Sir,it was a legit request .But I do honour and
respect people's privacy.Sir,I am removing your name from my Google+ circle
as you suggested on the mail.Also,remember I do not have any malicious
intentions as such.
From
-Kaushik Guha.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Aar
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 21:41 +0530, Kaushik Guha wrote:
> To Aaron Konstan: Well, "apper" is the actual name represented as per
> Fedora16,now this user's community gmail space is not for programming
> as we all know,I think, typos,lower-upper case letter mixing, doesn't
> affect much.Though you ar
On 1/28/2012 9:02 AM, Kaushik Guha wrote:
[...]
I am getting hit with emails from Google+ about Kaushik Guha adding me
to his circles and requesting that I join Google+. Normally I would
ignore, but given the tendency of this list to lite up on most anything
non-Fedora that comes along, I wan
On 28/01/12 17:02, Kaushik Guha wrote:
Thanks,Frank.I followed your advice,and after erasing the*npapi-vlc*
package along with the *whole of vlc-core package*,system has come to
its stability(regarding updates/upgrades) as it seems.
If I want to freshly install vlc package,shouid I use *YUM* or t
Thanks,Frank.I followed your advice,and after erasing the*
npapi-vlc*package along with the
*whole of vlc-core package*,system has come to its stability(regarding
updates/upgrades) as it seems.
If I want to freshly install vlc package,shouid I use *YUM* or through *
apper?*
I want the whole librari
On 28/01/12 16:36, Kaushik Guha wrote:
Currently I am at ease with KDE,and I am in it while I write
this.Occasionally I use LXDE also,but GNOME-3.x seems to be uneasy
with*me *at least.
I've stated earlier,that it was my mistake to enable most of the repos.
in the repos list.
I had already disabl
Currently I am at ease with KDE,and I am in it while I write
this.Occasionally I use LXDE also,but GNOME-3.x seems to be uneasy with* me
*at least.
I've stated earlier,that it was my mistake to enable most of the repos. in
the repos list.
I had already disabled all "rawhide" repos and also the "ATr
On 28/01/12 16:11, Kaushik Guha wrote:
To Frank,Kevin,Reindl,John...Friends: I actually wanted to enable the
repos. list(not all),since I want to *UPGRADE *this distro
Fedora16(64-bit) to Fedora 17(64-bit)(due to launch in May/June
2012)without losing any files,applications,tools etc. until insta
Am 28.01.2012 17:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> To Frank,Kevin,Reindl,John...Friends: I actually wanted to enable the repos.
> list(not all),since I want to *UPGRADE* this distro Fedora16(64-bit) to
> Fedora 17(64-bit)(due to launch in May/June 2012) without losing any
> files,applications,tools e
To Aaron Konstan: Well, "apper" is the actual name represented as per
Fedora16,now this user's community gmail space is not for programming as
we all know,I think, typos,lower-upper case letter mixing, doesn't affect
much.Though you are correct that we should be true about information &
facts.
To
On 28/01/12 06:19, Kaushik Guha wrote:
Thank you again Reindl.
Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
Sorry,to bother you Friend.
What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
those packages which has ending as "*.fc17" .The rest package
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 10:41 +0530, Kaushik Guha wrote:
> I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos.,along with all the
> "Test Updates" repos. from Fedora using "Apper"(A fantastic Tool).
Since everone else shares the things that bug them let me join the
crowd.
The name of the program from
On 28/01/12 15:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.01.2012 15:22, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 28/01/12 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
nobody knows where the repo "_local" lives
locate local.conf
the path is listd in there.
really? :-)
less of the smartarse. please.
> /etc/fonts/conf.avail/51-loc
On 01/28/2012 08:46 AM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
>
> On 01/28/2012 12:19 AM, Kaushik Guha wrote:
>> Thank you again Reindl.
>> Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
>> Sorry,to bother you Friend.
>>
>> What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I u
Am 28.01.2012 15:22, schrieb John Pilkington:
> On 28/01/12 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> maybe after soem hours your machine would be clean, but realize
>> it is not an easy job since yu have enabled all sort of braindead
>> repos including ATrpms and your whole setup is broked
>>
> You seem
Am 28.01.2012 15:22, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> On 28/01/12 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> nobody knows where the repo "_local" lives
>
> locate local.conf
> the path is listd in there.
really? :-)
/etc/fonts/conf.avail/51-local.conf
/etc/fonts/conf.d/51-local.conf
/etc/modprobe.d/local.conf
anf
On 01/28/2012 12:19 AM, Kaushik Guha wrote:
> Thank you again Reindl.
> Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
> Sorry,to bother you Friend.
>
> What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
> those packages which has ending as "*.fc17" .
On 28/01/12 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
maybe after soem hours your machine would be clean, but realize
it is not an easy job since yu have enabled all sort of braindead
repos including ATrpms and your whole setup is broked
You seem very free in your dismissal of the ATrpms repo, which I have
On 28/01/12 14:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
nobody knows where the repo "_local" lives
locate local.conf
the path is listd in there.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
Am 28.01.2012 07:19, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> Thank you again Reindl.
> Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
> Sorry,to bother you Friend.
>
> What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
> those packages which has ending as
> "*.fc17"
Thank you again Reindl.
Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
Sorry,to bother you Friend.
What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
those packages which has ending as "*.fc17" .The rest packages with
updates(*.fc16) are fine in updatin
Am 28.01.2012 06:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos
why were they enabled?
this is a road to hell!
> What about the "ATrpms" repositories? I've disabled it
> earlier...should I enable it?
only if you want to kill yur system over the long
ATrpms is kno
Agreed Friends,about the comments.
I request you people,not to make a war of words amongst each other.
I Thank very much to: Reindl Harald;
Kevin Martin;
Joe Zeff ;for the valuable suggestions
given by you.
I did uncheck/disable the Fe
On 01/27/2012 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
without EXPLICIT warning that it is generally not a good idea and
why tjhere may be enough uneducated users who starts thinking
"well if something does not run disbale gpgcheck is a solution"
I agree that the only time skipping the check is a good i
Am 27.01.2012 20:07, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 01/27/2012 08:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> so tell him "yum --nogpgcheck upgrade" because this is temporary, tell
>> people disable it per option will mostly result in permanently disabled
>
> I don't know about anybody else, but I had the impression
On 01/27/2012 08:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so tell him "yum --nogpgcheck upgrade" because this is temporary, tell
people disable it per option will mostly result in permanently disabled
I don't know about anybody else, but I had the impression that this was
exactly what he was suggesting. A
On 01/27/2012 08:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
tell someone he should disable gpgcheck is dumb, because you suggest if people
have problems they should do this - WTF do you understand why this exists and
what damage are hapenning if you get a bad core-package on your system which
was only installed
On 01/27/2012 10:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 17:28, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>> yum clean all and yum upgrade will solve some problems, but certainly not
>> 99% of them. For example, I *am* a
>> tester of rawhide and have been fighting a battle with the x11 updates. I
>> finall
Am 27.01.2012 17:28, schrieb Kevin Martin:
> yum clean all and yum upgrade will solve some problems, but certainly not 99%
> of them. For example, I *am* a
> tester of rawhide and have been fighting a battle with the x11 updates. I
> finally removed about 25 x11 packages
> that I determined w
On 01/27/2012 10:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 17:14, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>>
>> On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
>>>
Am 27.01.2012 17:14, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>
>
> On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> Dear Friends,
>
>
> While upg
Thanks Kevin.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
>
> On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>
> On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
>
> Dear Friends,
>
>
> While up
On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>>
>>
>> On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
>
>
>
> On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
>>> Dear Friends,
>>>
>>>
>>> While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a
>>> problem is
>>> occurring while upgrading pac
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
>> Dear Friends,
>>
>>
>> While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a problem
>> is
>> occurring while upgrading packages.
>>
>> 19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Head
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> Dear Friends,
>
>
> While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a problem
> is
> occurring while upgrading packages.
>
> 19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
> key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY
>
On 06/17/2010 06:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:03:07PM -0700, JD wrote:
>
>> The info below shows my problem.
>> 1:libguestfs-1.2.8-1.fc13.i686
>>
> Grab the latest package which fixes this issue:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/libgues
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:03:07PM -0700, JD wrote:
> The info below shows my problem.
> 1:libguestfs-1.2.8-1.fc13.i686
Grab the latest package which fixes this issue:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/libguestfs
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.
The info below shows my problem.
$ sudo yum -y update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386
| 951 B 00:00
google-chrome
55 matches
Mail list logo
