Thanks Kevin. On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Martin <kevi...@ameritech.net> wrote:
> > > On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin: > > On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha: > > Dear Friends, > > > While upgrading through "Yumex" ,everything is running well,except a problem > is > occurring while upgrading packages. > > 19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, > key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY > /19:46:52 : ERROR: Error in yum Transaction : Public key for > npapi-vlc-1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not > installed/ > > How to rectify the error in yum Transaction,on the last line.Please Help me. > > this package must not be in the F16 repo and i guess this is already fixed > throw away yumex and type "yum cleanall && yum upgrade" in a root-shell if > you do not want to wait > > > Install the public key or turn on "no GPG check" under options in Yumex. > > Kevin > > why in the world do you give such TOTALLY WRONG advises > after a correct answer? > > a) .fc17 is not intented to be for F16 > b) "noGPG check" generally to set is a dumb action > > > > > > > Hmm, interesting question. > > I'm guessing, based on what's missing in his yumex output (you did > notice that he had trimmed some stuff out of the middle, right) that he has > libvlc installed and has, at some point in the past, installed the > npapi-vlc plugin for libvlc rpm and, perhaps, we're not seeing an update > request for libvlc (due to his trimming the output) which may also require, > possibly, an update for npapi-vlc. He does have > rpmfusion-free-rawhide-source as one of his active repositories, which is > where the source for npapi-vlc comes from. > > So no, it's *not* in the F16 repo and perhaps no, it's not already fixed > since there's nothing to fix and perhaps he enjoys using yumex so your > asinine comment to "throw away yumex" doesn't help matters at all and yes, > you are correct that .fc17 is not "intented" (intended, BTW) to be for F16 > but, be that as it may, it still was picked up, probably as a result of > some dependency checking that was done. > > Oh, and by the way, it's "advice", not advises, and your "correct answer" > was not necessarily correct at all, just your shooting your mouth off > without doing any actual research as to what may have occurred. If you > can't offer semi-knowledgeable advice, don't attack people who do. > > Kevin > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > >
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
